Abstract:The transition between two different phases of a substance is an everyday process, which is encountered amongst others in the geomechanical field, for example, in CO2 storage. The transition from the liquid to the gaseous phase and vice versa crosses the so‐called two‐phase region, where both phases coexist for specific temperature and pressure conditions. In this context, two mass‐balance equations are defined for both fluid phases, respectively. These two equations are coupled by the mass‐production term, which describes the mass transfer between the two phases during phase transition. A great variety of models exist to describe phase transition processes in zero dimensional systems, e. g., batch reactors. However, only a few articles can be found, where phase changes inside a porous medium are discussed. An approach to the latter case can be based on the well‐founded, continuum‐mechanical Theory of Porous Media (TPM), which allows to describe multi‐phasic flow inside a deformable porous medium. By evaluating the entropy inequality, a constitutive relation for the mass production term can be derived. This term compares to the two‐film theory, the standard model for the description of mass transfer in a two‐phase system. Adapting this relation to porous media leads to a mass transfer coefficient, which represents the kinetic behaviour of the molecules of the substance under consideration and the influence of the solid porous material on the phase transition process. For lack of experimental data, the mass transfer coefficient will be composed of the transfer coefficient from classical thermodynamics and geometrical information of the porous‐media structure. The thermodynamical behaviour of the fluid is described by, e. g., the Redlich‐Kwong‐Soave equation of state. Simulations conducted with either changing temperature or pressure boundary conditions are compared with simulations, where only one mass balance is used for both fluid phases and the mass transition is only visible by the jump in density. This allows for the verification of the derived constitutive relation. (© 2014 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Similarity between fluidization and phase transition

Novel Phase Inversion Model for Gas–solid Turbulent Fluidized Beds

Phase coexistence in fluidization

A quasi-three-phase approach for simulating gas-solid fluidized bed under different flow patterns

Effect of Cohesive Particle Addition on Bubbling Characteristics of Gas-Solid Fluidized Bed: Meso-scale Mechanism

Meso-scale modeling: beyond local equilibrium assumption for multiphase flow

On Coherent Structures in Gas–solid Fluidization

Phase Transitions Affected by Natural and Forceful Molecular Interconversion

Phase separation in fluids with many interacting components

Behavior of fluidized beds similar to equilibrium states

Heterophase fluctuations at the gas-liquid phase transition

Modeling and Numerical Investigation of Transient Two-Phase Flow with Liquid Phase Change in Porous Media

A numerical study of fluidization characteristics in transition from aggregative to particulate flow

Apparent phase transitions and critical-like behavior in multi-component mixtures

Model Comparison, Thermal Nonequilibrium Characteristic and Boundary Conditions Discussion of Two-Phase Flow with Phase Change in Porous Media

Multiscale modeling of nonequilibrium gas–liquid mixture flows in phase transition regions

Criterions of Phase Transitions in Dispersed Multiphase Systems Based on an Extended Lattice Model

Thermodynamic crossovers in supercritical fluids

Constitutive relation for the mass transfer during a gas‐liquid phase transition in porous media

Statistical modeling of equilibrium phase transition in confined fluids

Constitutive model for solid-like, liquid-like, and gas-like phases of granular media and their numerical implementation