Influence of Highly Asymmetric Pore Structure on Capillary Bonding of Porous Membranes
Jaylene Martinez,Shouhong Fan,Salil Rabade,Adrienne Blevins,Kieran Fung,Jason P. Killgore,Stefano Berti Perez,Kathy Youngbear,Christina Carbrello,Sean Foley,Xiaoyun Ding,Rong Long,Robert Castro,Yifu Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4151647
2022-01-01
Abstract:Reliable bonding of high-performance membranes onto polymeric supporting structures is critical for capitalizing their potentials within practical applications. The successful bonding typically requires infiltration of the membrane pores by a thermoplastic polymer, driven by capillary pressure and/or external pressure. In this work, we systematically examine the capillary infiltration of a polypropylene (PP) within polyethersulfone (PES) membranes with a highly asymmetric pore structure, a nominal pore size of 20 nm, and varying degrees of hydrophilicity. Most significantly, the infiltration kinetics was strongly influenced by the asymmetric pore structure in two aspects: (1) the time to achieve full infiltration from the large-pore side was approximately 4x that from the tight-pore side; (2) When bonding from the tight-pore side, the infiltration depth, L(t) showed L (t) ~ t 1.6 , instead of characteristic L (t) ~ t 0.5 . Such an acceleration in infiltration rate over time was successfully modelled with the Cai model using depth-dependent pore size that captures the asymmetric pore structure. Furthermore, chemical modification reduced initial infiltration rate only, which is attributed to the reduction in surface porosity. No significant difference in infiltration kinetics at the later stage was observed. Mechanical integrity tests of the bonded samples display complex debonding behaviors including complete peeling, incomplete peeling, and complete membrane failure. The peel force corresponding to membrane failure appeared larger than other two debonding modes, all of which showed insignificant dependence on the membrane chemistry or infiltration depth. Post-mortem analysis of the completely peeled sample showed PP nanofibers were pulled out of the PES membranes during debonding, emphasizing relatively weak mechanical interlocking due to the low surface porosity.