Influence of Routing Methods on Outflow of SWMM Model

Tong WANG,Xiang DING,Tian CAI,Wen-rui LIU,Jie TU,Fen-fen WU,Gui-xin WEN,Cun-jie SHI,Tong WU,Cong-qi LI,Zheng SUN,Xiao-peng GUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19853/j.zgjsps.1000-4602.2018.15.026
2018-01-01
Abstract:The principles of steady flow, kinematic wave and dynamic wave were analyzed. A SWMM model was built for a residential area in Xi'an. The parameters of the model were calibrated to the measured rainfall and runoff data. Discharge hydrographs were calculated for four different return periods of rainfall using three routing methods. The computation time of the routing methods were compared for long rainfall duration. Results indicated that the steady flow method was suitable for simple and low precision simulations, and it provided insights to simulations of low return periods or long simulation periods. The kinematic wave method had more accurate simulation result for short rainfall duration than the steady flow, but it also was not suitable for simulation of heavy rainfall events. However, if high simulation precision was not required, especially for a long simulation period, the method could provide a more stable result. The precision of dynamic wave method in low return period was slightly higher than those of the other two methods. When simulating a large return period rainfall event, dynamic wave had absolute advantages regarding the modelling precision and should be the top choice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?