Relationship Between Personal Medical Care and Microvascular Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Beijing

Jinping Zhang,Lixia Jin,Wenhui Zhao,Tieshan Zhang,Wenying Yang,Jianzhong Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2016.08.004
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To investigate the relationship between different medical payment methods and control rate of glucose, blood lipid and blood pressure, and to analyze its influence on the prevalence of microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in communities. Methods A total of 2 213 patients with T2DM from 27 community clinics in Beijing were enrolled in this study. For each patient, the information of medical history, physical examination, blood biochemistry parameter, and medical insurance status were collected. The glycated hemoglobin A1c<7%, systolic blood pressure<140 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), diastolic blood pressure<80 mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein<2.6 mmol/L were set as the target goals. The patients were divided into good medical care group(reimbursed by government/company or citizen medical insurance) and poor medical care group(self-paid or paid in other ways)&nbsp;according to the medical payment methods. The control rates of blood glucose, blood lipid and blood pressure were compared separatedly and integratedly between the two groups. The association of diabetic complications, including diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy, with medicine payment status was evaluated. The single factor variance analysis, t test, Chi square test and Logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results Among the 2 213 patients with T2DM, 1 419 (64.1%) belonged to good medical care group, and 794 (35.9%) belonged to poor medical care group. The average age and the duration of diabetes were (61±9) vs (58±9) years and (8±6) vs (7±5) years, respectively (t=6.644, 5.237, both P<0.05). The control rates of blood glucose, blood pressure, blood lipids and integrated of above all were 52.9%(750/1 419), 38.8%(551/1 419), 44.7%(635/1 419) and 9.7%(138/1 419) in the good medical care group , and 41.3%(328/794), 21.7%(172/794), 39.0%(310/794) and 3.7%(29/794) in the poor medical care group, respectively (χ2=27.160, 68.220, 6.780 and 26.910, all P<0.01). The prevalence of diabetic complications of peripheral neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy were 20.4%, 31.6% and 34.3%in poor medical care group, and 12.4%, 21.7%and 27.8%in good medical care group, respectively (χ2=25.180, 26.470 and 10.200, all P<0.01). Conclusion The control of T2DM and its complications is better in patients with good medical care.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?