Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Value of diffusion optical tomography and ultrasonic elastography in the differential diagnosis of ;breast lesions

Ultrasonic diffused optical tomography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions——a comparative study with diffusion weighted imaging

Diagnostic Evaluations of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Mammary Duct Ectasia and Breast Cancer

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Value of Combined Application of Ultrasonic Elastography and Conventional Ultrasonography in the Differen tial Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

The Value of Automated Breast Volume Scanning, Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesion

Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Breast Neoplasms

Value of Ultrasound Elastography Combined with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Micro-Flow Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.

The Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

The value of three-dimensional ultrasonography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast lesions

Test Evaluation of Diagnosis of Breast Tumor Nature by Ultrasonic Elastography,Conventional Ultrasonography and Both

Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and Quantification: Value in Malignancy Prediction for Complex Cystic and Solid Breast Lesions

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Evaluation of diagnosis of breast tumors with two-dimensional ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography

Value of automated breast volume scanner and elastography in differential diagnosis of breast lesions

The value of medical image processing in elastography of breast

Diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound elastography combined with conventional ultrasonography for breast neoplasm

Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficiency for Breast Neoplasms Using Multiple Imaging Diagnostic Technology

Quantitative Analysis of Shear Wave Elastography and US-Guided Diffuse Optical Tomography for Evaluating Biological Characteristics of Breast Cancer

A Comparative Study of Three Ultrasonic Elastographic Methods for the Differentiation and Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Combined Use of the Automated Breast Volume Scanner and the US Elastography for the Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Lesions of the Breast