Removal of iodide from simulated radioactive wastewater using hybrid process combining precipitation-microfiltration

Yun YANG,Ping GU,Yang LIU,Guanghui ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11949/j.issn.0438-1157.20161228
2017-01-01
Abstract:The treatment of radioactive wastewater by chemical precipitation method has the advantages of being simple, wide application and large amount of water treatment. Membrane separation technology can improve the effectiveness of solid liquid separation. In this paper, precipitation and membrane separation technology were combined to treat the simulated wastewater containing radioactive iodide on a laboratory scale. The initial iodide concentration was approximately 5 mg·L?1. The concentration of added Na2SO3used for removing oxygen from the influent was 40 mg·L?1 and the dosage of CuCl used as a precipitant was 260 mg·L?1. The entire system was under the protection of nitrogen gas that was recycled after drying. The whole process was operated continuously, which was controlled by programmable logic controller (PLC). The I?removal mechanism was the formation of sparingly soluble CuI. Besides that, Cu2O and Cu(II) ion were produced in this reaction system, which were demonstrated by solid phase analysis. This study investigated I? removal efficiency and other water quality parameters under different temperatures and the effects of two membrane flux 4.17×10?6m·s?1 and 8.33×10?6 m·s?1on membrane fouling. The operation time was 168 h and the volumes of treated wastewater were 1540 L. In two tests, the average I?removal efficiency was 94.8% with stable effluent water qualities. However, the Cu(II) ion concentrations in the effluent were higher and it was required for the subsequent removal. Under the conditions that the membrane fluxes were 4.17×10?6m·s?1 and 8.33×10?6 m·s?1, the final membrane specific flux decreased to 65.0% and 55.0% of the initial one, respectively, and the membrane specific flux values of the membrane modules were recovered to 90.0% and 79.0% of the initial one, respectively after physical and chemical cleaning. Furthermore, the average concentration factor value was 2.02×103, and the volume of the sludge produced in the experiment was small.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?