Cost-minimization Analysis of Albumin-bound Paclitaxel vs. Solvent-based Paclitaxel in the Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer

Liping FAN,Yuanyuan JIAO,Zihan GUO,Yanhua ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2016.32.04
2016-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the economics of albumin-bound paclitaxel vs. solvent-based paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer(MBC),and provide reference for clinical treatment decision making. METHODS:Medical records of 15 MBC patients receiving albumin-bound paclitaxel or solvent-based paclitaxel respectively were selected from HIS during Jan. 2011 to May 2015,including 72,74 chemotherapy cycles. Using every 2 consecutive cycles of chemotherapy as a measure point, cost data and the results of clinical efficacy evaluation were collected. Objective remission rate and the incidence of ADR were calculated, and pharmacoeconomic analysis was conducted. RESULTS:Compared with solvent-based paclitaxel, objective remission rate of was albumin-bound paclitaxel was higher,without statistical significance(47.22% vs. 37.84%,P>0.05);there was no statistical significance in the number of ADR cases(19 cases vs. 16 cases,P>0.05);cost-minimization analysis could be used to study the economics of them. The cost of albumin-bound paclitaxel was higher than that of solvent-based paclitaxel (37 404.82 yuan vs. 17 049.02 yuan), which was supported by sensitivity anlysis. CONCLUSIONS:Therapeutic efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel is slightly better than that of solvent-based paclitaxel,but the latter has pharmacoeconomic advantage. The drugs should be selected according to the condition of patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?