Mid-term efficacy of endovascular aortic repair in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with complex proximal neck

马腾腾,戴向晨,罗宇东,冯舟,范海伦,朱杰昌,胡凡果,张益伟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101411-20191023-00071
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the mid-term result of endovascular aortic repair (EVRA) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with complex proximal neck.Methods:Data of 175 patients with infrarenal AAA who underwent EVAR were collected in Department of Vascular Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from June 2013 to June 2016. According to the anatomy of proximal neck, patients were divided into complex group and non-complex group. Technique success rate, surgical success rate, and perioperative and follow-up complications rates of the two groups were retrospectively analyzed.Results:There were 84 cases in the complex group and 91 cases in the non-complex group. No significant differences in age, gender, co-morbidity and proportion of ruptured AAA were found between two groups(all P>0.05). When compared with non-complex group, the complex group had shorter neck length, larger aneurysmal diameter and more complicated distal anatomic factors (all P<0.05). The proportion of untraditional EVAR in the complex group [19%(16/84), 14 cases of the chimney EVAR (chEVAR), 2 cases of the fenestrated EVAR (fEVAR)] was significantly higher than that of non-complex group (0%, P=0.001). There were no significant differences in the success rate of device release and surgical success rate in the complex group compared with the non-complex group (98% vs 100% and 95.2% vs 100%, all P>0.05, respectively). The proximal neck-related complications in complex group (3 cases of type Ⅰa endoleak, 1 case of conversion to open surgery) was no significant difference compared with non-complex group (4.8% vs 0%, P=0.051). There was no intraoperative death in both groups. No significant difference was found in perioperative mortality between non-complex group and complex group (2.2% vs 0%, P=0.498). No new proximal neck-related complications occurred in both groups during the perioperative period. All cases were followed up for (52±10.3) months, and one case died of myocardial infarction at two-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in new proximal neck-related complications rate between complex group (2 cases of type Ⅰa endoleak and 1 case of pseudoaneurysm at the proximal end of the stent) and non-complex group (3.6% vs 0%, P=0.263). No significant difference was found in reintervention rate between complex group and non-complex group (3.6% vs 9.9%, P=0.265). Conclusions:EVAR (including chEVAR, fEVAR) can obtain good mid-term efficacy for suitable infrarenal AAA with complex proximal neck. fEVAR is a better method to extend proximal landing zone, while chEVAR still plays an important role for AAA with severe tortuosity or under emergent rupture.Docking technique is suitable for AAA with diameter of proximal neck more than 28 mm.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?