Design of an injury device to establish spinal cord dorsal compression injury models in rats

Jian-feng Li,Shi-qing Feng,Run-fu Xia,Jin-yu Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2015.18.012

2015-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND:With the development of spinal cord injury study, different methods of establishing spinal cord injury models have emerged, including spinal cord contusion, fal ing weight, spinal compression, chemical burn, radiation, hormone, spinal transection and hemi-section. However, lots of them are not perfect enough. <br> OBJECTIVE:To design the injury device of spinal cord injury and establish different degrees of spinal cord injury models. <br> METHODS:To design the device of producing spinal cord injury and establish different degrees of spinal cord dorsal compression injury in Sprague-Dawley rats by various weights (m1=10 g, m2=20 g, m3=30 g) and time points (T1=3 s, T2=5 s). Rats were randomly divided as m1T1, m2T1, m3T1, m1T2, m2T2 and m3T2 groups. While sham group was also made. <br> RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) score in injury groups decreased significantly after operation, when compared with the sham group (P<0.01). The m 1T1 group showed no significant difference in BBB score from other groups (P<0.01). The BBB score of m1T2 group was significant higher than m2T2 group and m3T2 group at 8 weeks after operation (P<0.05). The somatosensory evoked potential and motion evoked potential of injury groups were longer than sham group at 8 weeks after operation (P<0.01). The motion evoked potential of each injury groups were significantly longer after operation (P<0.05). The somatosensory evoked potential was significantly longer in injury groups, except m1T1 and m1T2 groups (P<0.05). The self-designed device can be applied to establish different degrees of spinal cord injury models.