In vitro detection methods of SOD-like activity for nanozymes: a comparative study

Yufeng Liu,Yihong Zhang,Quanyi Liu,Quan Wang,Anqi Lin,Jie Luo,Yan Du,Ying-Wu Lin,Hui Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0AN02164D
2021-01-01
Abstract:Analyzing SOD-like activity of nanozymes in vitro is of great importance for identifying new nanozymes and predicting their potential biological effects in vivo. However, false negative or positive results occasionally occur due to the mismatch between the detection methods and nanozymes. Here, five typical SOD-like nanozymes, including CeO2, Mn3O4, Prussian blue (PB), PCN222-Mn, and Pt NPs, have been used to evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of several commonly used in vitro detection methods. By systematically analyzing the detecting results, several precautions have been summarized. (1) Hydroethidine (HE) probe could be disturbed by nanozyme with oxidative ability. (2) Nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT)probe has a moderate sensitivity due to the poor water solubility of its reduced product. (3) Water-soluble tetrazolium salts (WST)-8 probe has a higher sensitivity than both NBT and iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (INT). (4) Detection system by using irradiation of riboflavin to produce •O2− might be interfered by nanozyme with photosensibility. (5) Both quality of DMPO and incubation time are important factors for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)measurement. This study will be useful for choosing more suitable in vitro detection methods of SOD-like activity for nanozymes in future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?