Abstract:Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyTo investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.Methods49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis.Main ResultsBiopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis.Importance of the ConclusionsFor pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions. Brief Description of the Purpose of the StudyTo investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. To investigate the clinical value and security of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guided biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. Methods49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis. 49 patients with 50 pancreatic lesions which could not be guided clearly by conventional ultrasound received CEUS guided biopsy using 18 Gauge needle. Satisfactory sampling was defined as the acquired tissues which were large enough to give a definite diagnosis. Pathological diagnosis or follow-up (at least 6 months) were taken as the final diagnosis. Main ResultsBiopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis. Biopsy of this group had a success rate of 98.0% with the mean puncture times of 2. 8. Qualitative diagnosis was obtained in 47 of 49 cases, resulted a qualitative diagnosis rate of 95.9% (47/ 49). 46 of 47 cases were corresponding to the final diagnosis and the coincidence rate was 97.9% (46/47). The sensitivity and specificity of biopsy was 97.9% and 100% respectively. Complications occurred in 1 case (2%) of biliary peritonitis. Importance of the ConclusionsFor pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions. For pancreatic lesions which could not be clearly guided by conventional ultrasound, CEUS guided percutaneous biopsy could not only improve the accuracy and sensitivity, but increase the success and effective rate of puncture. With lower incidence of complication and better security, CEUS guided biopsy is an effective method in characterizing pancreatic lesions.

Optimal Number of Needle Passes During EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions with 22G ProCore Needles and Different Suction Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Optimal Sampling Technique for EUS-guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using a 25-Gauge ProCore Needle: A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Superiority Study

Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS-fine needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A Prospective Multicenter Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing FNA and FNB in the Diagnosis of Solid Masses

Twenty Versus 40 Back-and-forth Needle Movements for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses: a Prospective, Crossover, Randomized Study.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Different Needle Types for Solid Pancreatic Masses: a Prospective and Randomized Comparative Trial in Two Centers

Mo1315 ONE AND DONE: EUS-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY IN PANCREATIC CANCER FOR DIAGNOSIS AND MOLECULAR ANALYSIS

How to Perform Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/Biopsy of Pancreatic Lesions?

Comparison of the Modified Wet Suction and Dry Suction Techniques in EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomised Controlled Trial

A Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Fine-Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions

Comparison of Smear Cytology and Liquid-Based Cytology in EUS-guided FNA of Pancreatic Lesions: Experience from a Large Tertiary Center

Percutaneous ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: An analysis of 1074 lesions

Guiding and controlling percutaneous pancreas biopsies with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: target lesions are not localized on B-mode ultrasound.

Analysis of Fine-Needle Biopsy Vs Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Abdominal Masses: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Guided Fine‐Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors

High diagnostic adequacy and accuracy of the new 20G procore needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition: Results of a large multicentre retrospective study

The Wet Suction Technique Enhances the Diagnostic Efficacy and Aspirate Quality of EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions

Guidance and Control of Percutaneous Biopsy in Pancreatic Lesions with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

Mo1378 Initial Experience with a Novel Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Core Biopsy Device

Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound‐guided Fine Needle Aspiration with Rapid On‐site Evaluation Performed by Endoscopists in Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial