Meta-analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC): an Update on 107 Randomized Trials and 19,805 Patients, on Behalf of MACH-NC Group

Benjamin Lacas,Alexandra Carmel,Cecile Landais,Stuart J. Wong,Lisa Licitra,Jeffrey S. Tobias,Barbara Burtness,Maria Grazia Ghi,Ezra E. W. Cohen,Cai Grau,Gregory Wolf,Ricardo Hitt,Renzo Corvo,Volker Budach,Shaleen Kumar,Sarbani Ghosh Laskar,Jean-Jacques Mazeron,Lai-Ping Zhong,Werner Dobrowsky,Pirus Ghadjar,Carlo Fallai,Branko Zakotnik,Atul Sharma,Rene-Jean Bensadoun,Maria Grazia Ruo Redda,Severine Racadot,George Fountzilas,David Brizel,Paolo Rovea,Athanassios Argiris,Zoltan Takacsi Nagy,Ju-Whei Lee,Catherine Fortpied,Jonathan Harris,Jean Bourhis,Anne Auperin,Pierre Blanchard,Jean-Pierre Pignon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.013
IF: 6.901
2021-01-01
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:Background and purpose: The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results. Materials and methods: Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint. Results: For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005). Conclusion: The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?