Late Quaternary strata and environmental evolution record of core LG in Longgang, north Jiangsu plain, China

XIA Fei,ZHANG Yongzhan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201802015
2018-01-01
Geographical Research
Abstract:Original experimental analysis results,including field descriptions,photos,grain size,14C dating,foraminifera,pollens and heavy minerals,of core LG sediments in Longgang,north Jiangsu plain of China,were acquired by predecessors in the 1980s.Based on studies on these data,plus referring to published results of adjacent area and new data in the study area,a reinterpretation of stratigraphic sequence,chronological framework and environmental evolution record of core LG was presented in this paper.The results showed that,(1) Core LG with a length of 34.8 m preserved the sedimentary environment evolution since Marine Isotope Stage 4 (MIS 4);this study area has undergone a progression of regional sedimentary environments (i.e.,river overbank,fluvial and lacustrine floodplain (the second stiff mud layer),intertidal and subtidal zone of relatively open tidal flat,subtidal zone of relatively open tidal flat,intertidal and lower part of supratidal zone of relatively open tidal flat,fluvial and lacustrine floodplain (the first stiff mud layer),coastal marsh in the supratidal zone,and chenier);the MIS 3 transgressive layer with tidal flat facies was well developed in this core;(2)The thickness of Holocene strata in the Longgang section of Xigang chenier is quite small and commonly less than 10 m;due to the fact that core LG has two stiffmud layers,the core should be located in paleointerfluves rather than in paleovalleys,and it is more logical that the top surface of the first stiff mud layer is regarded as the base of Holocene strata,furthermore,it is impossible that its Holocene strata reached 25 m in thickness which the original researchers argued;(3) Since all of the conventional and AMS 14C dating results which are older than the Last Glacial Maximum have errors and uncertainties with different levels,and dating materials for mud and calcareous concretions are prone to be contaminated,the two 14C dating results in the second stiff mud layer of core LG are younger than the real age obviously and could not be adopted to interpret the strata age.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?