Abstract:Aims: The aims of this thesis were to analyze reduced number of implants supporting full arch fixed mandibular prostheses and fixed partial dentures (FPDs), non-submerged healing and early loading in the edentulous mandible. A further aim was to evaluate fit of Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) milled I-Bridge frameworks. Material & methods: Paper I. One hundred and nineteen patients rehabilitated with full arch mandibular prostheses supported by four implants were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Paper II. A total of 178 patients provided with FPDs supported by two (n=92) or three implants (n=122) of whom 123 were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 9.4 years. Paper III. Early and delayed loading of full arch mandibular prostheses were evaluated in 109 patients, 54 with delayed loading and 55 with early loading, with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Paper IV. Submerged and non-submerged implant placement for supporting fixed prostheses in the edentulous mandible were evaluated after five years in 29 patients. Paper V. The precision of fit of CNC-milled I-Bridge frameworks was evaluated using two different implant systems. Results: Paper I. The five-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) for implants was 99.1% and for prostheses 100%. Mean bone loss from baseline to five-year follow-up was 0.5 mm. No indication could be found that the number of supporting implants influenced the prosthetic complications. Paper II. The five-year implant and prosthesis CSR was 97.7% for two-implant supported FPDs and 97.3% for three-implant supported FPDs. Mean bone loss at five years was 0.4 mm. Significantly more prosthetic and abutment screw loosening were seen in two-implant supported FPDs. Paper III. Five-year CSR for implants was 94.4% and 92.5% for prostheses in early loading, and 97.9% and 98.0% in the delayed loading group. More prostheses needed adjustment or replacement in the early group, but patients treated with early loading were more pleased with the treatment procedure. Paper IV. Five-year CSR survival rate was 99.4%. Three implants fractured in one patient. Mean bone loss at five years was 0.7 mm in submerged implants and 0.5 mm in non-submerged implants. Paper V. All frameworks demonstrated clinically acceptable fit with mean distortion values within 23 microm (x-axis), 26 microm (y), 4 microm (z- axis) and 34 microm (3-D) for all frameworks. Control frameworks displayed greater levels of distortion than frameworks produced in a strict test situation. Conclusion: A reduction of the number of supporting implants to four implants in full arch mandibular prostheses and two implants in three unit FPDs in partial edentulous jaws resulted in the same clinical outcome as when more implants are used. Non-submerged implant placement in the edentulous mandible was as predictable as submerged, but early loading of implant-supported mandibular prostheses incurred more prosthetic complications. Computer numerical controlled milled frameworks presented levels of precision of fit within limits considered to be clinically acceptable and superior to earlier published results on cast frameworks.

Evaluation of 1-Piece Versus 3-Piece Framework Designs for the Edentulous Mandible with Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Clinical, Occlusal and Biomechanical Study.

Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible with Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.

The effect of mandibular flexure on the design of implant-supported fixed restorations of different facial types under two loading conditions by three-dimensional finite element analysis

Biomechanical analysis of inclined and cantilever design with different implant framework materials in mandibular complete-arch implant restorations

Mandibular Flexure and Peri-Implant Bone Stress Distribution on an Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Mandibular Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis

[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis]

A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of a Single Implant Retained Overdenture Reinforced with Short Versus Long Frameworks

Effect of Different Framework Materials in Implant-Supported Fixed Mandibular Prostheses: A Finite Element Analysis

Influence of Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behaviour of Mandibular Implant-Retained/supported Overdentures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible

A three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical function for 4 removable partial denture designs with 3 framework materials: CoCr, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and PEEK

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant‐supported fixed prostheses with cantilever extension in anterior mandible: A retrospective study

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two kinds of extracoronal attachments in a new design to restore maxillary edentulous jaw

The optimal design and three-dimensional finite element analysis of CAD/CAM integrated roach attachment

Biomechanical Effects of Different Load Cases with an Implant-Supported Full Bridge on Four Implants in an Edentulous Mandible: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis (3D-FEA)

Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials

On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading

Biomechanical Properties of the Complete Mandibular Subperiosteal Implant under Different Bite Loads

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Efficiency of Mandibular Anterior Implant-Supported Fixed Bridges with Cantilevers

The Design and Biomechanical Evaluation of Individual Mandibular Prosthesis

Effect of different implant configurations on biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported mandibular monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses