Deep learning‐based fast denoising of Monte Carlo dose calculation in carbon ion radiotherapy
Xinyang Zhang,Hui Zhang,Jian Wang,Yuanyuan Ma,Xinguo Liu,Zhongying Dai,Rui He,Pengbo He,Qiang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16719
IF: 4.506
2023-09-02
Medical Physics
Abstract:Background Plan verification is one of the important steps of quality assurance (QA) in carbon ion radiotherapy. Conventional methods of plan verification are based on phantom measurement, which is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Although the plan verification method based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation provides a more accurate modeling of the physics, it is also time‐consuming when simulating with a large number of particles. Therefore, how to ensure the accuracy of simulation results while reducing simulation time is the current difficulty and focus. Purpose The purpose of this work was to evaluate the feasibility of using deep learning‐based MC denoising method to accelerate carbon‐ion radiotherapy plan verification. Methods Three models, including CycleGAN, 3DUNet and GhostUNet with Ghost module, were used to denoise the 1 × 106 carbon ions‐based MC dose distribution to the accuracy of 1 × 108 carbon ions‐based dose distribution. The CycleGAN's generator, 3DUNet and GhostUNet were all derived from the 3DUNet network. A total of 59 cases including 29 patients with head‐and‐neck cancers and 30 patients with lung cancers were collected, and 48 cases were randomly selected as the training set of the CycleGAN network and six cases as the test set. For the 3DUNet and GhostUNet models, the numbers of training set, validation set, and test set were 47, 6, and 6, respectively. Finally, the three models were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively using RMSE and three‐dimensional gamma analysis (3 mm, 3%). Results The three end‐to‐end trained models could be used for denoising the 1 × 106 carbon ions‐based dose distribution, and their generalization was proved. The GhostUNet obtained the lowest RMSE value of 0.075, indicating the smallest difference between its denoised and 1 × 108 carbon ions‐based dose distributions. The average gamma passing rate (GPR) between the GhostUNet denoising‐based versus 1 × 108 carbon ions‐based dose distributions was 99.1%, higher than that of the CycleGAN at 94.3% and the 3DUNet at 96.2%. Among the three models, the GhostUNet model had the fewest parameters (4.27 million) and the shortest training time (99 s per epoch) but achieved the best denoising results. Conclusion The end‐to‐end deep network GhostUNet outperforms the CycleGAN, 3DUNet models in denoising MC dose distributions for carbon ion radiotherapy. The network requires less than 5 s to denoise a sample of MC simulation with few particles to obtain a qualitative and quantitative result comparable to the dose distribution simulated by MC with relatively large number particles, offering a significant reduction in computation time.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging