Abstract:As an important method of propagating and distributing product information,word-of-mouth significantly influences consumers' purchase decisions and has attracted tremendous research interests from academia.Since the 1960s,researchers have gradually reached some consensus on the motivation and influential factors of word-of-mouth.Moreover,the related empirical studies have achieved rich results as well.However,relatively few researchers have studied this topic by developing analytical models.Consumers' prior expectation on the product quality is usually assumed to be given in the literature.Very few papers assume it to be the firm's controllable variable or consider the influence of discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance on word-of-mouth.Based on the previous studies,this paper converts consumers' expected quality into products' advertised quality,which can be directly controlled by advertising or indirectly influenced by word-of-mouth.In addition,we consider the discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance.Sensitive to this discrepancy and the level of discrepancy sensitivity are introduced into our model as two significant exogenous variables.We build a two-stage model and obtain the advertised optimal quality and pricing strategy.Influences of ad cost,and discrepancy between the prior expectation and the actual performance on the optimal strategies and profits are also discussed.Numerical analysis is conducted to further explore our findings.Results showed that the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy and the level of discrepancy sensitivity has strong influence on firm's optimal strategies.When the ad cost is medium,the firm will choose a low ad intensity (i.e.the advertised quality is lower than the actual quality) if the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy is large enough.Otherwise,it will choose a high ad'intensity (i.e.the advertised quality is smaller than the true quality).The higher the actual quality is,the more this firm is inclined to invest in the low ad intensity if the proportion of consumers who are sensitive to discrepancy is small enough.When the ad cost medium,the low ad intensity will be the firm's optimal strategy,and the ad intensity will increase with the level of discrepancy sensitivity.When the ad cost is not that high,the more sensitive to discrepancy consumers is,the more inclined the company is to invest in the highest ad intensity.

Advertising, Goodwill, and the Veblen Effect

The Dynamic Optimal Strategic Analysis for a Monopolist Advertising and Pricing Based on Goodwill

A dynamic advertising model with reference price effect

Pricing and lot-sizing policies for products with demand under Veblen effect

Selling to customers with both Veblen and network effects.

Style Over Substance? Advertising, Innovation, and Endogenous Market Structure

Product Innovation, Process Innovation and Advertising-Based Goodwill: A Dynamic Analysis in a Monopoly

An optimal advertising model with carryover effect and mean field terms

Informing, Transforming, and Persuading: Disentangling the Multiple Effects of Advertising on Brand Choice Decisions

Pricing Cause-Related Marketing Products

A dynamic analysis of a monopolist's quality improvement, process innovation and goodwill

Advertising and price competition in a manufacturer-retailer channel

Dynamic Pricing and Advertising with Demand Learning

Game Analyses of Advertising in Supply Chains for a Single-Period Product

Modeling the impact of product quality on dynamic pricing and advertising policies

Optimal Decisions for Sellers Considering Valuation Bias and Strategic Consumer Reactions.

Measuring the lagged effects of advertising goodwill on dynamic promotional efficiency in the automobile industry

Influence of disconfirmation and word-of-mouth on advertising strategy

The Effect of Risk Aversion on Manufacturer Advertising in a Two-Stage Supply Chain

Better is Better? Signaling Paradoxes in Performance-Based Advertising

Implications of Advertising Lag on the Dynamic Optimal Decisions in an O2O Supply Chain