Abstract:Remarkable success has been achieved in the discovery of ceramic alkali superionic conductors as electrolytes in solid-state batteries; however, obtaining a stable interface between these electrolytes and electrodes is difficult. Only limited studies on the compatibility between electrodes and solid electrolytes have been reported, partially because of the need for expensive instrumentation and special cell designs. Without simple yet powerful tools, these compatibility issues cannot be systematically investigated, thus hindering the generalization of design rules for the integration of solid-state battery components. Herein, we present a methodology that combines density functional theory calculations and simple experimental techniques such as X-ray diffraction, simultaneous differential scanning calorimetry and thermal gravimetric analysis, and electrochemistry to efficiently screen the compatibility of numerous electrode/electrolyte pairs. We systemically distinguish between the electrochemical stability of the solid-state conductor, which is relevant wherever the electrolyte contacts an electron pathway, and the electrochemical stability of the electrode/electrolyte interfaces. For the solid electrolyte, we are able to computationally derive an absolute thermodynamic stability voltage window, which is small for Na3PS4 and Na3PSe4, and a larger voltage window which can be kinetically stabilized. The experimental stability, when measured with reliable techniques, falls between these thermodynamic and kinetic limits. Employing a Na solid-state system as an example, we demonstrate the efficiency of our method by finding the most stable system (NaCrO2 vertical bar Na3PS4 vertical bar Na-Sn) within a selected chemical space (more than 20 different combinations of electrodes and electrolytes). Important selection criteria for the cathode, electrolyte, and anode in solid-state batteries are also derived from this study. The current method not only provides an essential guide for integrating all-solid-state battery components but can also significantly accelerate the expansion of the electrolyte/electrode compatibility data.

Stability of Interphase Between Solid State Electrolyte and Electrode

Fundamentals of Electrolytes for Solid-State Batteries: Challenges and Perspectives

Revisiting the Electrochemical Stability of Solid Electrolytes

A Dynamically Stable Sulfide Electrolyte Architecture for High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

In Situ Formation of Stable Dual-Layer Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Enhanced Stability and Cycle Life in All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

How Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Forms in Aqueous Electrolytes

Progress and perspective of the cathode/electrolyte interface construction in all‐solid‐state lithium batteries

Multi-layered Electrolytes for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

A Dynamically Stable Mixed Conducting Interphase for All‐Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries

Challenges and Prospects of All‐Solid‐State Electrodes for Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Understanding Interface Stability in Solid-State Batteries

Compatibility Issues Between Electrodes And Electrolytes In Solid-State Batteries

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Probing of the Interphase Between Solid-State Sulfide Electrolytes and a Lithium Anode

Designing electrolytes and interphases for high-energy lithium batteries

Sulfide‐Based Solid‐State Electrolytes: Synthesis, Stability, and Potential for All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Recent Advances in Stability Issues of Inorganic Solid Electrolytes and Composite Solid Electrolytes for All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Interfacial compatibility design of high-performance electrolytes for SiCO-based all-solid-state lithium battery

Anode Interface in All-Solid-state Lithium-Metal Batteries: Challenges and Strategies

Grain-Boundary-Rich Interphases for Rechargeable Batteries.

Stabilizing the interphase between Li and Argyrodite electrolyte through synergistic phosphating process for all-solid-state lithium batteries