Global retrieval of TROPOMI tropospheric HCHO and NO2 columns with improved consistency based on updated Peking University OMI NO2 algorithm
Yuhang Zhang,Huan Yu,Isabelle De Smedt,Jintai Lin,Nicolas Theys,Michel Van Roozendael,Gaia Pinardi,Steven Compernolle,Ruijing Ni,Fangxuan Ren,Sijie Wang,Lulu Chen,Jos Van Geffen,Mengyao Liu,Alexander Cede,Alexis Merlaud,Martina Friedrich,Andreas Richter,Ankie Piters,Vinod Kumar,Vinayak Sinha,Thomas Wagner,Yongjoo Choi,Hisahiro Takashima,Yugo Kanaya,Hitoshi Irie,Robert Spurr,Wenfu Sun,Lorenzo Fabris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-182
IF: 4.184
2024-11-13
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Abstract:The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), onboard the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) satellite launched in October 2017, is dedicated to monitoring the atmospheric composition associated with air quality and climate change. This paper presents the global retrieval of TROPOMI tropospheric formaldehyde (HCHO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 )vertical columns using an updated version of the Peking University OMI NO 2 (POMINO) algorithm, which focuses on improving the calculation of air mass factors (AMFs). The algorithm features explicit corrections for the surface reflectance anisotropy and aerosol optical effects, and uses daily high-resolution (0.25°×0.25°) a priori HCHO and NO 2 profiles from the Global Earth Observing System Composition Forecast (GEOS-CF) dataset. For cloud correction, a consistent approach is used for both HCHO and NO 2 retrievals, where (1) the cloud fraction is re-calculated at 440 nm using the same ancillary parameters as those used in the NO 2 AMF calculation, and (2) the cloud top pressure is taken from the operational FRESCO-S cloud product. The comparison between POMINO and reprocessed (RPRO) operational products in April, July, October 2021 and January 2022 exhibits high spatial agreement, but RPRO tropospheric HCHO and NO 2 columns are lower by 10 % to 20 % over polluted regions. Sensitivity tests with POMINO show that the HCHO retrieval differences are mainly caused by different aerosol correction methods (implicit versus explicit), prior information of vertical profile shapes and background corrections; while the NO 2 retrieval discrepancies result from different aerosol corrections, surface reflectances and a priori vertical profile shapes as well as their non-linear interactions. With explicit aerosol corrections, the HCHO structural uncertainty due to the cloud correction using different cloud parameters is within ± 20 %, mainly caused by cloud height differences. Validation against ground-based measurements from global Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations and the Pandonia Global Network (PGN) shows that in April, July, October 2021 and January 2022, POMINO retrievals present a comparable day-to-day correlation but a reduced bias compared to the RPRO products (HCHO: R = 0.62, NMB = −30.8 % versus R = 0.68, NMB = −35.0 %; NO 2 : R = 0.84, NMB = −9.5 % versus R = 0.85, NMB = −19.4 %). An improved agreement of HCHO/NO 2 ratio (FNR) with PGN measurements based on POMINO retrievals is also found ( R = 0.83, NMB = −18.4 % versus R = 0.82, NMB = −24.1 %). Our POMINO retrieval provides a useful source of information particularly for studies combining HCHO and NO 2 .
meteorology & atmospheric sciences