Retrieving tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: effects of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy and vertical profile of nitrogen dioxide

J.-T. Lin,R. V. Martin,K. F. Boersma,M. Sneep,P. Stammes,R. Spurr,P. Wang,M. Van Roozendael,K. Clémer,H. Irie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-21203-2013
2013-01-01
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions
Abstract:Abstract. Retrievals of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) are subject to errors in the treatments of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy, and vertical profile of NO2. Here we quantify the influences over China via an improved retrieval process. We explicitly account for aerosol optical effects (simulated by nested GEOS-Chem at 0.667° lon × 0.5° lat and constrained by aerosol measurements), surface reflectance anisotropy, and high-resolution vertical profiles of NO2 (simulated by GEOS-Chem). Prior to the NO2 retrieval, we derive the cloud information using consistent ancillary assumptions. We compare our retrieval to the widely used DOMINO v2 product, using as reference MAX-DOAS measurements at three urban/suburban sites in East China and focusing the analysis on the 127 OMI pixels (in 30 days) closest to the MAX-DOAS sites. We find that our retrieval reduces the interference of aerosols on the retrieved cloud properties, thus enhancing the number of valid OMI pixels by about 25%. Compared to DOMINO v2, our retrieval improves the correlation with the MAX-DOAS data in the day-to-day variability of NO2 (R2 = 0.96 vs. 0.72). Our retrieved NO2 columns are about 50% of the MAX-DOAS data on average. This reflects the inevitable spatial inconsistency between the two types of measurement, uncertainties in MAX-DOAS data, and residual uncertainties in our OMI retrievals related to aerosols and vertical profile of NO2. Through a series of tests, we find that excluding aerosol scattering/absorption can either increase or decrease the retrieved NO2, with a mean absolute difference by about 20%. Concentrating aerosols at the boundary layer top enhances the retrieved NO2 by 8% on average with a mean absolute difference by 23%. The aerosol perturbations also affect nonlinearly the retrieved cloud fraction and particularly cloud pressure. Employing various surface albedo datasets alters the retrieved NO2 by 0–7% on average. The retrieved NO2 columns increase when the NO2 profiles are taken from MAX-DOAS retrievals (by 20% on average) or TM4 simulations (by 10%) instead of GEOS-Chem simulations. Our findings are also relevant to retrievals of other pollutants (e.g., sulfur dioxide, formaldehyde, glyoxal) from UV-vis backscatter satellite instruments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?