Abstract:Human timing behaviors are consistent with Bayesian inference, according to which both previous knowledge (prior) and current sensory information determine final responses. However, it is unclear whether the brain represents temporal priors exclusively for individual modalities or in a supramodal manner when temporal information comes from different modalities at different times. Here we asked participants to reproduce time intervals in either a unisensory or a multisensory context. In unisensory tasks, sample intervals drawn from a uniform distribution were presented in a single visual or auditory modality. In multisensory tasks, sample intervals from the two modalities were randomly mixed; visual and auditory intervals were drawn from two adjacent uniform distributions, with the conjunction of the two being equal to the distribution in the unisensory tasks. In the unisensory tasks, participants' reproduced times exhibited classic central-tendency biases: shorter intervals were overestimated and longer intervals were underestimated. In the multisensory tasks, reproduced times were biased toward the mean of the whole distribution rather than the means of intervals in individual modalities. The Bayesian model with a supramodal prior (distribution of time intervals from both modalities) outperformed the model with modality-specific priors in describing participants' performance. With a generalized model assuming the weighted combination of unimodal priors, we further obtained the relative contribution of visual intervals and auditory intervals in forming the prior for each participant. These findings suggest a supramodal mechanism for encoding priors in temporal processing, although the extent of influence of one modality on another differs individually.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Visual timing and auditory timing influence each other when time intervals in the two modalities are drawn from two adjacent distributions and are randomly intermixed. A Bayesian model with a supramodal prior (distribution of intervals from both modalities) outperforms the model using sensory-specific priors in describing participants' performance. A generalized model further reveals that the prior is represented as a weighted average of the distribution of time intervals from the two modalities, which differ individually.

Supramodal Representation of Subsecond Time and the Impact of Its Training on Unimodal Temporal Interval Discrimination

A Supramodal and Conceptual Representation of Subsecond Time Revealed with Perceptual Learning of Temporal Interval Discrimination.

Double training reveals an interval-invariant subsecond temporal structure in the brain

Perceptual learning evidence for an interval- and modality-invariant representation of subsecond time

Crossmodal to unimodal transfer of temporal perceptual learning

Mutual Transfer Between Visual and Auditory Temporal Interval Learning Supports a Central Clock in Temporal Processing

Fast Transfer of Crossmodal Time Interval Training

Fast Transfer of Cross-Modal Interval Training Needs Attentional Engagement

Temporal context modulates cross-modality time discrimination: Electrophysiological evidence for supramodal temporal representation

Adaptation to Visual or Auditory Time Intervals Modulates the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion

Supramodal Representation of Temporal Priors Calibrates Interval Timing.

Sub- and Supra-Second Timing in Auditory Perception: Evidence for Cross-Domain Relationships

Sleep-dependent Consolidation Benefits Fast Transfer of Time Interval Training

Audiovisual Illusion Training Improves Multisensory Temporal Integration.

Similar CNV Neurodynamic Patterns between Sub- and Supra-Second Time Perception

Temporal Configuration as a New Feature of Sound: Psychological and Neurophysiological Evidence, Cross-species Consistency and Underlying Neuronal Mechanisms

Adaptation to Temporal Interval Modulates the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion

Training with Temporally Modified Speech Results in Dramatic Improvements in Speech Perception and Language Comprehension

Modality-Attention Promotes the Neural Effects of Precise Timing Prediction in Early Sensory Processing.

The Influences of the Number of Stimuli As Well As Their Presentation Mode on Time Perception in Milliseconds and Supra-seconds Range

Complete Cross-Frequency Transfer of Tone Frequency Learning after Double Training.