0071 Does Additional Training on a Motor Sequence Task Improve Sleep-Dependent Memory Consolidation for Older Adults?
Cassandra Delvey,Katrina Rodheim,Bethany Jones,Rebecca Spencer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0071
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction While sleep can improve memory performance, not all memory domains demonstrate this effect. Prior studies show that hippocampal engagement during encoding is necessary for subsequent sleep-dependent memory consolidation. However, motor sequence learning typically engages other areas and inconsistently demonstrates sleep-related gains, particularly among older adults. Hippocampal engagement via explicit sequence awareness and strong learning ability increases the possibility of sleep-related procedural memory gains. Therefore, we compared sleep-dependent memory consolidation on an explicit motor sequence task in older adults who received standard training to those who received additional training. Methods Healthy older adults (N=24; 67.7 ± 4.5 years; 71% female), assigned to a standard training group (n=12) or an over-training group (n=12), were trained on an explicit motor sequence learning task; standard training comprised 5 blocks of practice while over-training included 10. Performance was tested before (“immediate”) and after (“delayed”) a day spent awake and a night spent asleep (conditions separated by ~1 week, order counterbalanced). Skill learning was calculated by subtracting median reaction time during learned sequences from that of randomly-cued button presses. Change in skill learning from immediate to delayed test for the wake interval was contrasted with change across sleep, resulting in a sleep benefit score. Sleepiness was assessed using the Stanford Sleepiness Scale prior to each testing session. Polysomnography (32-channel, Brainvision) was recorded during the overnight sleep visit. Results A planned comparison of immediate test results, to check baseline differences resulting from training, showed that the over-training group was significantly faster than the standard training group (t(23)=4.796, p<.001, d=1.18). Analysis of sleep benefit scores showed no significant benefit with standard training (t(11)=0.778, p=.453) or over-training (t(10)=1.342, p=.209), and over-training does not provide a significantly greater sleep benefit than standard training (t(23)=4.796, p=.590). Conclusion Our results replicate prior findings that standard training of a motor sequence task in older adults does not demonstrate sleep-dependent memory gains. Moreover, here we show that additional training does not improve the chances of demonstrating such gains, despite significantly improving initial performance. Because sleep spindles have been previously linked to motor sequence learning across sleep, future analysis will include polysomnography recordings. Support (if any) NIH R01 HL111695
neurosciences,clinical neurology