Synergistic Effects of UVC and Oxidants (PS Vs. Chlorine) on Carbamazepine Attenuation: Mechanism, Pathways, DBPs Yield and Toxicity Assessment

Mengyuan Xu,Jing Deng,Anhong Cai,Cheng Ye,Xiaoyan Ma,Qingsong Li,Shiqing Zhou,Xueyan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127533
IF: 15.1
2020-01-01
Chemical Engineering Journal
Abstract:The environmental impact and health risk of carbamazepine (CBZ) in water environment has been continuously reported. Ultraviolet C (UVC)/persulfate (PS) and UVC/chlorine (NaClO) processes were confirmed to be able to efficiently eliminate CBZ through the oxidation by reactive radicals (52.82% SO4- ? and 44.21% ?OH in UVC/PS system, 53.47% RCS and 43.84% ?OH in UVC/chlorine process, pH 7.0). The second-order rate constants of CBZ reacted with ?OH, SO4- ? and RCS were determined to be 8.2 ? 109, 9.1 ? 108 and 4.2 ? 1010 M-1 s-1, respectively. In both processes, increasing oxidants dosage and rising temperature was favorable for elimination, while increasing CBZ concentration retarded its degradation rate. The coexisting of NOM, SO42- and CO3 2?/HCO3? presented the inhibitory effect, while NO3? promoted the removal. NH4+ exerted an inhibitory effect in UVC/ chlorine process, while exerted no obvious influence in UVC/PS system. Cl- posed a promoting role in UVC/PS treatment and a dual effect in UVC/chlorine process. pH affected the quantum yield of chlorine photolysis and the formation of RCS and ?OH. The degradation of CBZ oxidation via UVC/chlorine process was more pH dependent. 12 and 14 CBZ oxidation products were identified in UVC/PS and UVC/chlorine systems, respectively. SO4- ?, RCS and ?OH were readily to attack C = C in CBZ molecule, mainly yielding hydroxylated CBZ, epoxy CBZ, pyridine aldehydes and ketones. Of the disinfection by-products (DBPs) assessed, both processes controlled the formation of haloacetic acids, while increased the generation of trichloromethane, especially via UVC/chlorine process. UVC/chlorine process was more economical and effective (EEO UVC/chlorine = 0.2213 kWh L-1), whereas UVC/PS process was safer in terms of DBPs and toxicity control.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?