CHROMOSOMAL STRUCTURAL REARRANGEMENTS IN COUPLES DOES NOT INFLUENCE THE RATE OF MOSAICISM IN THEIR EMBRYOS

Shujing He,Lei Jia,Yida Wang,Zhiqiang Zhang,Cong Fang,Xiao-yan Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.086
IF: 6.7
2020-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:To investigate whether the rate of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos is influenced by the chromosomal structural rearrangements in couples and the sex of the translocation carrier in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). A single center retrospective study performed between June 2018 and June 2020. The study included the data analysis of 754 blastocysts from 231 couples detected with Next Generation Sequencing(NGS). The cut-off values for reporting mosaic levels in our laboratory ranged from 40% to 70% . According to the couples’ chromosome karyotype, blastocysts were divided into three groups: reciprocal translocation carriers(N=442), Robertsonian translocation carriers(N=104), and couples with normal karyotype(N=208). The mean female age in all groups was similar and statistically non-significant(30.6±4.1, 31.2±2.7 and 31.0±5.0 for reciprocal translocation carriers, Robertsonian translocation carriers and couples with normal karyotype, 30.5±4.0 and 30.9±4.4 for male and female carriers). Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS statistics 22.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Independent-Sample T test and Chi-square test was used as appropriate. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0. P<0.05 was defined as a statistically significant difference. The mosaicism rate of reciprocal translocation carriers, Robertsonian translocation carriers and couples with normal karyotype were 4.30%(19/442), 10.58%(11/104) and 6.73%(12/208), respectively. There was no statistical significance in the mosaicism rate of reciprocal translocation carriers and couples with normal karyotype (4.30% vs. 6.73%, P=0.118). And Robertsonian translocation carriers were not statistically prone to have more mosaic embryos than couples with normal karyotype (10.58% vs. 6.73%, P=0.238). When considering the sex of the translocation carrier, in reciprocal translocation group, the mosaicism rate of male carriers and female carriers was 5.19%(14/270) and 2.86%(5/172) respectively without statistical difference(P=0.250). The mosaicism rate of male Robertsonian translocation carriers and female Robertsonian translocation carriers was 14.55%(8/55) and 6.12%(3/49) respectively, and there was no statistical significance, too(P=0.163). The frequency of mosaic embryos was not influenced by the chromosomal structural rearrangements in couples. Chromosomal translocation carriers generated more aneuploidy embryos, but they did not tend towards generating more mosaic embryos compared with couples with normal karyotype. And the sex of the translocation carrier did not influence the mosaicism rate, too. The possible reason is that reciprocal or Robertsonian translocation may not lead to errors in mitotic divisions during embryo early development.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?