Abstract:Abstract Study question How does embryo transfer with a low-level of mosaicism affect the success of ART programs, pregnancy, and live birth in comparison with euploid embryo transfer? Summary answer The transfer of mosaic embryos results in the delivery of a healthy baby however significantly decreases the outcome of ART programs and live birth rate. What is known already Present methods of preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy (PGT-A) allow detecting a mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells at the blastocyst stage with high accuracy. Such embryos are classified as mosaics with varying levels according to the guidelines of the International Society for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGDIS). Numerous sources describe that number of mosaic embryos can vary from 4 to 22%. Several publications report that mosaic embryos can lead to successful pregnancies and healthy childbirth, but with a lower frequency and higher rates of pregnancy loss compared to euploid embryos. Nevertheless, the effect of mosaicism on ART outcomes remains controversial. Study design, size, duration It has been analyzed 2506 embryos from 648 patients undergoing the ART program with PGT-A at the Institute of Reproductive Medicine for 2018 - 2019. Embryos after PGT-A were classified as euploid, aneuploid, and having mosaicism of less than 40% as low level and more than 40% as high level following PGDIS guidelines. Patients of (group A) were transferred 467 single euploid embryos, and 43 patients (group B) underwent single low-level mosaic embryo transfer. Participants/materials, setting, methods The embryos on day 5 or 6 were graded by Gardner Scoring System. Approximately 5–10 TE cells were biopsied from good quality blastocysts and subsequently vitrified. PGT-A was performed utilizing an array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) (Agilent). The transfer of mosaic embryos was performed in the absence of an alternative, only after medical genetic counseling with a risk explanation and the subsequent signing of an informed agreement. Statistical tests processed by Pearson’s chi-squared test. Main results and the role of chance Of all analyzed embryos, the proportion of euploid embryos was 48.6% (n = 1002), the total number of mosaics was 18.6% (n = 384) and aneuploid ones were 32.8% (n = 676). Depending on the level of mosaicism, the ratio between embryos with low-level mosaicism (≤40%) / high-level (≥40%) was 38.3% / 61.7%, respectively. According to the study, there was a significant decrease in the indicator of clinical pregnancy rate after embryo transfer with a low-level of mosaicism of 44.1% versus 63.2% transferred euploid embryo (р<0,01), however, despite an increase losses pregnancy in the group B (26.3%) there was no significant difference (p = 0.16) in comparison with the control group (15.4%). The live birth rate (LBR) significantly decreased (p < 0.001) after the transfer of the mosaic embryo by 32.5%, while in the control group the indicator was 53.9%. In all cases, after the transfer of the mosaic embryo, healthy babies were born. There were 2 cases of high-level mosaic embryo transfer as a result of which pregnancy did not occur. According to the survey, about 70% of patients agree to replant mosaic embryos, 20% are ready to go to the new program, and 10% cannot make a decision. Limitations, reasons for caution The number of patients in group B was significantly lower than in group A. Not enough cases of embryo transfer with a high-level of mosaicism. Wider implications of the findings: The current study might help to develop and to select a more appropriate strategy for transfer mosaic embryos. The next series of studies should focus on obstetric and neonatal outcome data from mosaic embryo transfer to gain a better understanding of the chromosomal and physiological health of children. Trial registration number Not applicable

Next-generation Sequencing Analysis of Embryos from Mosaic Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Preimplantation Genetic Testing.

Parental Mosaicism Detection and Preimplantation Genetic Testing in Families with Multiple Transmissions of De Novo Mutations.

Living Birth Following Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders to Prevent Low-Level Germline Mosaicism Related Nicolaides–Baraitser Syndrome

Comprehensive Preimplantation Genetic Testing by Massively Parallel Sequencing

Application of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies with Next-Generation Sequencing in Women with Advanced Maternal Age

Using SNP array to identify aneuploidy and segmental imbalance in translocation carriers.

Research Progress on Mosaic Embryo Transfer and Pregnancy Risk

Chromosomal, Gestational, and Neonatal Outcomes of Embryos Classified as a Mosaic by Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Regional and developmental characteristics of human embryo mosaicism revealed by single cell sequencing

Genetic screening revealed widespread mosaicism in human early embryos

[Analysis of related factors influencing the detection rate of mosaic embryo and the pregnancy outcomes with mosaic embryo transfers]

Healthy Live Births after the Transfer of Mosaic Embryos: Self-Correction or PGT-A Overestimation?

Transfer Value of Mosaic Embryos after PGT

A prospective double-blinded non-selection trial of reproductive outcomes and chromosomal normalcy of newborns derived from putative low/moderate-degree mosaic IVF embryos

Human embryos harbor complex mosaicism with broad presence of aneuploid cells during early development

The inconsistency between two major aneuploidy-screening platforms—single-nucleotide polymorphism array and next-generation sequencing—in the detection of embryo mosaicism

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements

P–564 Analysis of efficiency and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs after embryo transfer with a low-level of mosaicism

Sperm Chromosome Analysis and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in an Infertile Male with Mosaic Trisomy 18

The Pregnancy Outcome of Mosaic Embryo Transfer: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Meta-Analysis