Difference Between Ammonia and Urea on Nitrogen Doping of Graphene Quantum Dots

Yanyun Zhu,Luting Yan,Mingyuan Xu,Yuting Li,Xiaodong Song,Lan Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125703
IF: 5.518
2020-01-01
Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
Abstract:Nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) with prime fluorescence properties were synthesized through a simple one-pot hydrothermal method by using citric acid as carbon source and ammonia (A-GQDs) or urea (UGQDs) as nitrogen source. Both A-GQDs and U-GQDs exhibited a graphene-like structure, but their average particle size is about ten times different. A-GQDs exhibited an evident excitation-dependent photoluminescence (PL) behavior. By contrast, the emission of U-GQDs can be divided into two regions with the development of excitation wavelength: a wavelength-independent emission peak at approximately 540 nm (green) with the excitation wavelength from 400 nm to 500 nm and an excitation-dependent emission peak with the excitation wavelength below 400 nm. Ammonia was introduced into citric acid polycondensator in the form of five membered ring and urea in the form of seven membered ring, respectively, which further affected the subsequent crystallization and surface functionalization. At this time, the structural instability of the nitrogen-containing doped ring itself, coupled with the progress of carbonization, mostly forms a stable nitrogen-containing ring structure, which is likely to be pyrrolic nitrogen or graphitized nitrogen. Therefore, the differences in particle size and nitrogen-containing doped rings partially between A-GQDs and U-GQDs lead to the differences in optical properties. Finally, U-GQDs with high quantum yield (QY) of 54 % were obtained at the molar ratio of 9:10 (citric acid/urea) by optimizing the reaction conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?