THE PRESENCE OF CESAREAN SECTION SCAR DIVERTICULUM IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOME OF FRESH AND FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER AFTER IN VITRO FERTILIZATION/INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION

Ling Huang,Sunxing Huang,Yubin Li,Minghui Chen,Lingli Long,Canquan Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.802
IF: 6.7
2020-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:The primary purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of cesarean scar diverticulum on the reproductive outcome of fresh and frozen embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The secondary aim of our study was to assess the impact of endometrial cavity fluid on the reproductive outcome of embryo transfer among patients with an existing cesarean scar diverticulum. This was a retrospective cohort study. 1275 patients who had a history of cesarean delivery between January 2013 and December 2018 at our Institute of Reproductive Medicine were included. The study included 847 cycles of fresh embryo transfer and 1213 cycles of frozen embryo transfer. According to the results of transvaginal gynecological ultrasound, the patients were divided into two groups: cesarean scar diverticulum group(n=169) and cesarean delivery without diverticulum group(n=1106). According to the presence of endometrial cavity fluid during the endometrial preparation process of frozen embryo transfer, patients with the cesarean scar diverticulum were divided into two subgroups: endometrial cavity fluid group(n=36) and non-endometrial cavity fluid group(n=108). The basic characteristics, pregnancy outcome and delivery outcome of the included patients were collected from the database of our institute and compared. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust confounding factors when the baseline demographic variables of two groups of patients were significantly different. The propensity score was computed by accounting for the effect of confounding factors. Propensity scores were matched 1:1 using the nearest neighbor matching method. The matched data set was used in logistic regression. There were no significant differences in the baseline variables between the cesarean scar diverticulum group and the control group. The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of fresh embryo transfer in the cesarean section diverticulum group was significantly lower than the control group(19.6% vs 32.5%,p=0.001; 25.7% vs 43.0%,p=0.001; 17.8% vs 31.6%,p=0.004). The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of frozen embryo transfer in the cesarean section diverticulum group was also significantly lower than the control group(27.1% vs 34.5%,p=0.015; 32.7% vs 41.2%,p=0.021; 23.5% vs 31.4%,p=0.021). 21.20% cycles of frozen embryo transfer among the cesarean section scar diverticulum group developed endometrial cavity fluid during endometrial preparation. The baseline variables were similar between the endometrial cavity fluid and non-endometrial cavity fluid group after propensity score matching. The odds of clinical pregnancy and miscarry were similar between two subgroups before and after adjustment for covariates (adjusted OR0.45( 0.18-1.12), P=0.086; adjusted OR 0.75(0.14-3.95), P=0.736). The presence of cesarean section scar diverticulum was detrimental to embryo implantation and had a bad impact on reproductive outcomes of fresh and frozen embryo transfer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?