Abstract:Information transmission in neural networks is influenced by both short-term synaptic plasticity (STP) as well as nonsynaptic factors, such as after-hyperpolarization currents and changes in excitability. Although these effects have been widely characterized in vitro using intracellular recordings, how they interact in vivo is unclear. Here, we develop a statistical model of the short-term dynamics of spike transmission that aims to disentangle the contributions of synaptic and nonsynaptic effects based only on observed presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking. The model includes a dynamic functional connection with short-term plasticity as well as effects due to the recent history of postsynaptic spiking and slow changes in postsynaptic excitability. Using paired spike recordings, we find that the model accurately describes the short-term dynamics of in vivo spike transmission at a diverse set of identified and putative excitatory synapses, including a pair of connected neurons within thalamus in mouse, a thalamocortical connection in a female rabbit, and an auditory brainstem synapse in a female gerbil. We illustrate the utility of this modeling approach by showing how the spike transmission patterns captured by the model may be sufficient to account for stimulus-dependent differences in spike transmission in the auditory brainstem (endbulb of Held). Finally, we apply this model to large-scale multielectrode recordings to illustrate how such an approach has the potential to reveal cell type-specific differences in spike transmission in vivo Although STP parameters estimated from ongoing presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking are highly uncertain, our results are partially consistent with previous intracellular observations in these synapses.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although synaptic dynamics have been extensively studied and modeled using intracellular recordings of postsynaptic currents and potentials, inferring synaptic effects from extracellular spiking is challenging. Whether or not a synaptic current contributes to postsynaptic spiking depends not only on the amplitude of the current, but also on many other factors, including the activity of other, typically unobserved, synapses, the overall excitability of the postsynaptic neuron, and how recently the postsynaptic neuron has spiked. Here, we developed a model that, using only observations of presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking, aims to describe the dynamics of in vivo spike transmission by modeling both short-term synaptic plasticity (STP) and nonsynaptic effects. This approach may provide a novel description of fast, structured changes in spike transmission.

Machine learning of synaptic structure with neurons to promote tumor growth

Binless Kernel Machine: Modeling Spike Train Transformation for Cognitive Neural Prostheses

Exploring the spatial effects influencing the EGFR/ERK pathway dynamics with machine learning surrogate models

The dark side of synaptic proteins in tumours

Tumor-induced neoneurogenesis and perineural tumor growth: a mathematical approach

Spike-driven Multi-Scale Learning with Hybrid Mechanisms of Spiking Dendrites.

A Synapse-Threshold Synergistic Learning Approach for Spiking Neural Networks

NeurostimML: a machine learning model for predicting neurostimulation-induced tissue damage

A Dendritic Architecture‐Based Deep Learning for Tumor Detection

Emergent Behaviors from a Cellular Automaton Model for Invasive Tumor Growth in Heterogeneous Microenvironments

Tmod-28. Modeling Microenvironmental Dynamics: A Novel 3D Glioma-Neuron Fusion Model

Cnsc-27. Intratumoral Cancer Cell Networks In Brain Metastases

Modeling Learnable Electrical Synapse for High Precision Spatio-Temporal Recognition.

Neural mass models as a tool to investigate neural dynamics during seizures

A model of NSCLC microenvironment predicts optimal receptor targets

Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics of in Vivo Excitatory Spike Transmission

Generalizable Machine Learning in Neuroscience Using Graph Neural Networks

Improving personalized tumor growth predictions using a Bayesian combination of mechanistic modeling and machine learning

Supervised Machine Learning for Bioelectrical Cellular Networks

Direct excitatory synapses between neurons and tumor cells drive brain metastatic seeding of breast cancer and melanoma

Neurons as stromal drivers of nervous system cancer formation and progression