Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic, prescriptive, remedial Resource Roos program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October and again in May. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lover limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the Keydath and the California tests for the learning disabled population under study. (Author/SD) The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students Abstract Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the Cali-Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic/prescriptive/ remedial Resource Room program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October 1972 and again in May 1973. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the KeyMath and the California for the learning disabled population under study. Various authors (Gronlund, 1971; Johnson and Myklebust, 1967; Jones, 1973; Lerner, 1971; Reisman, 1972) agree that diagnosis and evaluation should he available to students and should be used in planning an educational program for each individual. Included in the diagnosis should be both assessment of how the child learns (learning modalities, learning styles) and how much he has achieved in each of the academic areas. Evaluation should be continual so that program plans may be changed as necessary toward achieving whatever educational goals have been set. There is much writing to be found in learning disabilities literature that focuses on perceptual development, language development, and reading, but relatively little available on arithmetic disabilities and their diagnosis. The California Arithmetic Test (CAT) (Tiegs & Clark, 1963) has been widely used as an achievement measure. An advantage of this test has been the "Diagnostic Analysis of Learning Difficulties" which catagorizes the items and thus provides a g.oss approximation of strengths and weaknesses. This and other standardized measures provide questionable results when administered to children in special education programs if normative data on such groups have not been established. Even when data is available on samples of handicapped children, the lack of national agreement on definitive identifiable characteristics and the inconsistency in labeling of groups such as emotionally disturbed, brain injured, learning disabled, dyslexic, etc. make generalization of test data dubious. Although use of criterionreferenced rather than norm-referenced tests has been proposed (Prager & Mann, 1973), the need for norm-referenced data to determine large scale program accountability in the public schools makes the rejection of norm-referenced measures unlikely. There is need for instruments that provide maximum achievement and diagnostic data and that can be administered by regular school personnel with a minimum of training. The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test (Connolly, Natchman, & Pritchett, 1971) offers an alternative to the CAT.

Assessing Kindergarteners’ Mathematics Problem Solving: the Development of a Cognitive Diagnostic Test

The Development and Influencing Factors of Kindergarteners’ Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Assessment

Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades

A comparative study on cognitive diagnostic assessment of mathematical key competencies and learning trajectories

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the KeyMath-3 Diagnostic Assessment

Psychometric Properties of an Instrument to Measure Word Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics

Diagnosing Writing Ability Using China’s Standards of English Language Ability: Application of Cognitive Diagnosis Models

An Examination of the Predictive Validity of the Keymath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the Wide Range Achievement Test in Exceptional Children.

The Contribution of Dynamic Assessment to Screening Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities

Cognitive and Affective Correlates of Chinese Children’s Mathematical Word Problem Solving

Test Construction for Cognitive Diagnosis

The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students

International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models

The Metacognitive Ability of Sixth-Year Primary School Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities and Their Performance on Application Problem Tests

Effects of Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematical Metacognition on Word Problem Solving in Children with and without Mathematical Learning Difficulties

Dynamic Assessment of Children's Mathematical Ability

Development and Evaluation of a Standardised Mediated Assessment of Young Children's Mathematical Ability in a Chinese Context

Estimation of Individuals’ Collaborative Problem Solving Ability in Computer-Based Assessment

Two-Stage Screening for Math Problem-Solving Difficulty Using Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning

Assessing Mathematical Deductive Reasoning Competence of Eighth-Grade Students from China

What Skills Could Distinguish Developmental Dyscalculia and Typically Developing Children: Evidence from a 2-Year Longitudinal Screening