Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic, prescriptive, remedial Resource Roos program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October and again in May. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lover limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the Keydath and the California tests for the learning disabled population under study. (Author/SD) The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students Abstract Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the Cali-Tho purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the KeyMith Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test when used with children identified as having specific learning disabilities. The samples consisted of children in grades one through three enrolled in a diagnostic/prescriptive/ remedial Resource Room program for children with specific learning disabilities. These children were from three of the eight schools housing the program. Both tests were administered in late September and early October 1972 and again in May 1973. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were computed for each pair of variables, as were 95% confidence intervals. The validity coefficients and the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals were significant at least at the 0.05 level. The results suggest that there is a significant positive relationship between the KeyMath and the California for the learning disabled population under study. Various authors (Gronlund, 1971; Johnson and Myklebust, 1967; Jones, 1973; Lerner, 1971; Reisman, 1972) agree that diagnosis and evaluation should he available to students and should be used in planning an educational program for each individual. Included in the diagnosis should be both assessment of how the child learns (learning modalities, learning styles) and how much he has achieved in each of the academic areas. Evaluation should be continual so that program plans may be changed as necessary toward achieving whatever educational goals have been set. There is much writing to be found in learning disabilities literature that focuses on perceptual development, language development, and reading, but relatively little available on arithmetic disabilities and their diagnosis. The California Arithmetic Test (CAT) (Tiegs & Clark, 1963) has been widely used as an achievement measure. An advantage of this test has been the "Diagnostic Analysis of Learning Difficulties" which catagorizes the items and thus provides a g.oss approximation of strengths and weaknesses. This and other standardized measures provide questionable results when administered to children in special education programs if normative data on such groups have not been established. Even when data is available on samples of handicapped children, the lack of national agreement on definitive identifiable characteristics and the inconsistency in labeling of groups such as emotionally disturbed, brain injured, learning disabled, dyslexic, etc. make generalization of test data dubious. Although use of criterionreferenced rather than norm-referenced tests has been proposed (Prager & Mann, 1973), the need for norm-referenced data to determine large scale program accountability in the public schools makes the rejection of norm-referenced measures unlikely. There is need for instruments that provide maximum achievement and diagnostic data and that can be administered by regular school personnel with a minimum of training. The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test (Connolly, Natchman, & Pritchett, 1971) offers an alternative to the CAT.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the KeyMath-3 Diagnostic Assessment

The KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test: Use with Learning Disabled Students

Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades

An Examination of the Predictive Validity of the Keymath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the Wide Range Achievement Test in Exceptional Children.

Assessing Kindergarteners’ Mathematics Problem Solving: the Development of a Cognitive Diagnostic Test

Two-Stage Screening for Math Problem-Solving Difficulty Using Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning

Measuring mathematics self-efficacy: Multitrait-multimethod comparison

Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability

A comparative study on cognitive diagnostic assessment of mathematical key competencies and learning trajectories

The Validity of Cognitive, Affective, and Demographic Variables in the Prediction of Achievement in High School Algebra and Geometry: Implications for the Definition of Mathematical Aptitude

Constructing and Validating a Q-Matrix for Cognitive Diagnostic Analyses of a Reading Test

Math Abilities Among Children with Neurodevelopmental Difficulties: Understanding Cognitive Factors and Evaluating a Pilot Intervention

Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Motivation Assessment Scale and Resident Choice Assessment Scale

Examining the Construct Validity for the Multiple-Content Testing Programs

Cognitive Profiles of Mathematical Problem Solving Learning Disability for Different Definitions of Disability

Validity study using factor analyses on the Defining Issues Test-2 in undergraduate populations

Psychometric Properties of the WRAT Math Computation Subtest in Mexican Adolescents

Korean Behavior Assessment System for Children 3rd Edition Teacher Rating Scales-Child Form: A Validation Study

Factor structure of school readiness skills: conceptual vs. statistical distinctions

Comparison of different item types in terms of latent trait in mathematics assessment

The Contribution of Dynamic Assessment to Screening Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities