Methods for Evaluating the Combined Effects of Chemical and Nonchemical Exposures for Cumulative Environmental Health Risk Assessment
Devon C. Payne-Sturges,Madeleine K. Scammell,Jonathan I. Levy,Deborah A. Cory-Slechta,Elaine Symanski,Jessie L. Carr Shmool,Robert Laumbach,Stephen Linder,Jane E. Clougherty,Devon Payne-Sturges,Madeleine Scammell,Jonathan Levy,Deborah Cory-Slechta,Jessie Carr Shmool,Jane Clougherty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122797
IF: 4.614
2018-12-10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Cumulative risk assessment (CRA) has been proposed as a means of evaluating possible additive and synergistic effects of multiple chemical, physical and social stressors on human health, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making, and protecting public health. Routine application of CRA to environmental regulatory and policy decision making, however, has been limited due to a perceived lack of appropriate quantitative approaches for assessing combined effects of chemical and nonchemical exposures. Seven research projects, which represented a variety of disciplines, including population health science, laboratory science, social sciences, geography, statistics and mathematics, were funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to help address this knowledge gap. We synthesize key insights from these unique studies to determine the implications for CRA practice and priorities for further research. Our analyses of these seven projects demonstrate that the necessary analytical methods to support CRA are available but are ultimately context-dependent. These projects collectively provided advancements for CRA in the areas of community engagement, characterization of exposures to nonchemical stressors, and assessment of health effects associated with joint exposures to chemical and psychosocial stressors.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences