Does Local Heating of the Carotid Body Chemoreceptors Modulate Ventilation or Hemodynamics?

Blair D. Johnson,James R. Sackett,Suman Sarker,Gregory L. Coleman,Christopher L. Chapman,Zachary J. Schlader
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.1243.11
2016-01-01
Abstract:Background Activation of the carotid body chemoreceptors is sympathoexcitatory and causes increases in ventilation, heart rate, and blood pressure. In vitro evidence indicates that heat stressed carotid body chemoreceptors are activated and cause an increase in carotid sinus nerve activity. However, the role that the carotid body chemoreceptors play in the physiological responses to whole body heat stress is not clear. We developed an experimental model to isolate heat stress to the carotid body chemoreceptors. This model will allow us to determine if local heating of the carotid body chemoreceptors influences ventilation and hemodynamics. Purpose We tested the hypothesis that local heating of the carotid body chemoreceptors modulates ventilation and hemodynamics. Methods Five healthy men (age: 25 ± 2) participated in two local heating protocols. In the CB heat protocol, local heaters (surface area: 7.9 cm 2 ) were adhered to the skin at the bifurcation of the left and right carotid artery and set to 44°C. In the ARM heat protocol, local heaters were adhered to the ventral side of both forearms and set to 44°C. Heat was applied for 45 minutes in both protocols. The protocols were randomized and separated by a minimum of 30 minutes or until skin blood flow returned to baseline values. We measured ventilation (heated pneumotach), heart rate (ECG), blood pressure (Finometer), and forearm skin blood flow (laser Doppler) throughout each protocol. Skin blood flow was also normalized to mean arterial pressure (MAP) and expressed as a percentage of the local heating induced maximal cutaneous vascular conductance (%CVCmax). Results Four of the five participants had an increase in ventilation from baseline ranging from 5–16% during CB heat. However, the change in ventilation from baseline was not statistically distinguishable between CB heat (0.5 ± 0.7 L/min) and ARM heat (−0.6 ± 1.2 L/min) (P = 0.14). The change in heart rate from baseline tended to be greater in CB heat vs. ARM heat (4 ± 4 vs. −3 ± 5 bpm; P < 0.08). The change in MAP was not different between protocols (CB heat: 3 ± 4 mmHg vs. ARM heat: 3 ± 3 mmHg; P = 0.45). When compared to baseline, skin blood flow (20 ± 9 vs. 13 ± 3 PU; P < 0.10) and %CVCmax tended to be lower during CB heat (7.2 ± 0.6 vs. 5.2 ± 1.8%; P < 0.07). Conclusions These preliminary data indicate that the carotid body chemoreceptors appear to play an independent role in the ventilatory and hemodynamic responses to heat stress. Support or Funding Information This project was supported by the University at Buffalo Innovative Micro‐Programs Accelerating Collaboration in Themes (IMPACT) program.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?