Attenuating Ventilation by Inhibiting the Carotid Body Chemoreceptors During Hyperthermia Modulates Thermal Sensation

Blair D. Johnson,Zachary J. Schlader,Craig G. Crandall,Michael J. Joyner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000477785.14398.39

2015-01-01

Abstract:Sensations of warmth and thermal discomfort escalate during hyperthermia. However, it is unclear if these measures are influenced by compensatory responses to hyperthermia, such as ventilation. PURPOSE: Test the hypothesis that lowering ventilation during hyperthermia by inhibiting carotid body activation would be associated with lower sensations of warmth and thermal discomfort. METHODS: Eight healthy subjects (31 ± 3 y) completed two randomized trials where hyperthermia was induced via water-perfused suit. In one trial IV saline (CON) was infused, while IV dopamine (2 μg/kg/min) (DA) was infused throughout the other trial to inhibit carotid body activation and lower ventilation. Ventilation was measured at baseline and when intestinal temperature reached 1.4 ± 0.2°C above baseline (HEAT). Concomitant with ventilation, thermal sensation and thermal discomfort were measured on 7 (1 = cold, 7 = hot) and 4 (1 = comfortable, 4 = very uncomfortable) point scales, respectively. RESULTS: Ventilation increased from baseline to HEAT in CON (7.9 ± 1.6 vs. 12.9 ± 3.3 l/min, P < 0.01) but was unchanged during DA (8.9 ± 2.0 vs. 10.4 ± 1.3 l/min, P = 0.19), such that ventilation was lower in DA vs. CON during HEAT (P < 0.01). The magnitude of increase in sensations of warmth was greater in CON (2.9 ± 0.8) when compared to DA (2.4 ± 0.5) (P < 0.03). When data from both trials were combined, the magnitude of increase in ventilation from baseline to HEAT was correlated to thermal sensation during HEAT (r = 0.63, P < 0.01). The magnitude of increase in thermal discomfort from baseline to HEAT was not statistically distinguishable between CON (2.2 ± 1.0) and DA (1.8 ± 0.8) (P = 0.13). When data from both trials were combined, thermal discomfort during HEAT was correlated with the magnitude of change in ventilation from baseline to HEAT (r = 0.48, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increases in ventilation during hyperthermia appear to be linked to heightened thermal sensation and discomfort. Attenuating increases in hyperthermia-induced hyperventilation might alter subjective heat tolerance in populations who have abnormal ventilatory patterns due to chronic carotid body activation (i.e. heart failure, sleep apnea, etc.). More research is warranted to determine if these links are causal or merely temporal during hyperthermia.