Abstract:Research Article| January 01, 2014 Kinematic Rupture Model and Hypocenter Relocation of the 2013 Mw 6.6 Lushan Earthquake Constrained by Strong‐Motion and Teleseismic Data Yong Zhang; Yong Zhang aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Rongjiang Wang; Rongjiang Wang aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Yun‐tai Chen; Yun‐tai Chen bInstitute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Lisheng Xu; Lisheng Xu bInstitute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Fang Du; Fang Du cEarthquake Administration of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Mingpei Jin; Mingpei Jin dEarthquake Administration of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650041, China Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hongwei Tu; Hongwei Tu aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Torsten Dahm Torsten Dahm aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Yong Zhang aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Rongjiang Wang aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Yun‐tai Chen bInstitute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China Lisheng Xu bInstitute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China Fang Du cEarthquake Administration of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China Mingpei Jin dEarthquake Administration of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650041, China Hongwei Tu aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Torsten Dahm aGFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam 14473, Germanywang@gfz-potsdam.de Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © 2014 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2014) 85 (1): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130126 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Yong Zhang, Rongjiang Wang, Yun‐tai Chen, Lisheng Xu, Fang Du, Mingpei Jin, Hongwei Tu, Torsten Dahm; Kinematic Rupture Model and Hypocenter Relocation of the 2013 Mw 6.6 Lushan Earthquake Constrained by Strong‐Motion and Teleseismic Data. Seismological Research Letters 2014;; 85 (1): 15–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220130126 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search On 20 April 2013, an Mw 6.6 earthquake struck Lushan, Sichuan province, China (hereafter as Lushan earthquake), which caused 196 deaths and 21 missing. As another disastrous earthquake occurred on the Longmenshan fault after the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, the Lushan earthquake stimulated an extensive discussion about its seismogenesis. In particular, whether it was a large aftershock of the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake has been heatedly debated (Chen et al., 2013; Du et al., 2013; Liu, Yi, et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Jia et... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Preface to the Focus Section on North Korea's September 2017 Nuclear Test and Its Aftermath

High-precision Location of North Korea's 2009 Nuclear Test

Triggered Seismicity after North Korea’s 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test

Seismological Evidence for a Low-Yield Nuclear Test on 12 May 2010 in North Korea

Source Characteristics of North Korea's 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test

Collapse and Earthquake Swarm After North Korea's 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test

Establishing the case for a May 2010 low-yield, unannounced nuclear test in North Korea

Remote monitoring of weak aftershock activity with waveform cross correlation: the case of the DPRK September 9, 2016 underground test

Reexamination Confirming Additional Seismic Evidence for the 12 May 2010 Low-Yield Nuclear Test

Bayesian Inversion of MDJ Seismograms for Source Parameters and Yields of DPRK Underground Nuclear Explosions 2 to 6

Infrasound from the North Korea underground explosion and subsequent collapse on 3 September 2017

Online Hybrid Test by Internet Linkage of Distributed Test-Analysis Domains by Peng Pan, Motohide Tada and Masayoshi Nakashima,Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005;34:1407–1425

GNSS observations of ionospheric disturbances in response to the underground nuclear explosion in North Korea

Geomagnetic Conjugate Observations of Ionospheric Disturbances in Response to a North Korean Underground Nuclear Explosion on 3 September 2017

Using Moment Tensor Inversions for Rapid Seismic Source Detection and Characterization: Application to the North Korean Nuclear Tests

Yield estimation of North Korean underground nuclear tests using Lg-wave source spectra

Measurement and Analysis of Surface Deformation after the Sixth Nuclear Explosion in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea Using InSAR

High-precision location and yield of North Korea's 2013 nuclear test

Ground Deformation Data from GEER Investigations of Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence

Kinematic Rupture Model and Hypocenter Relocation of the 2013 Mw 6.6 Lushan Earthquake Constrained by Strong-Motion and Teleseismic Data

Quantitative assessment to the impact of InSAR ionospheric and tropospheric corrections on source parameter modelling: application to the 4th nuclear test, North Korea