Abstract:Although many studies have revealed that the atmospheric effects of electromagnetic wave propagation (including ionospheric and tropospheric water vapour) have serious impacts on Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) measurement results, atmospheric corrections have not been thoroughly and comprehensively investigated in many well-known cases of InSAR focal mechanism solutions, which means there is no consensus on whether atmospheric effects will affect the InSAR focal mechanism solution. Moreover, there is a lack of quantitative assessment on how much the atmospheric effect affects the InSAR focal mechanism solution. In this paper, we emphasized that it was particularly important to assess the impact of InSAR ionospheric and tropospheric corrections on the underground nuclear explosion modelling quantitatively. Therefore, we investigated the 4th North Korea (NKT-4) underground nuclear test using ALOS-2 liters-band SAR images. Because the process of the underground nuclear explosion was similar to the volcanic magma source activity, we modelled the ground displacement using the Mogi model. Both the ionospheric and tropospheric phase delays in the interferograms were investigated. Furthermore, we studied how the ionosphere and troposphere phase delays could bias the estimation of Mogi source parameters. The following conclusions were drawn from our case study: the ionospheric delay correction effectively mitigated the long-scale phase ramp in the full-frame interferogram, the standard deviation decreased from 1.83 to 0.85 cm compared to the uncorrected interferogram. The uncorrected estimations of yield and depth were 8.44 kt and 370.33 m, respectively. Compared to the uncorrected estimations, the ionospheric correction increased the estimation of yield and depth to 9.43 kt and 385.48 m, while the tropospheric correction slightly raised them to 8.78 kt and 377.24 m. There were no obvious differences in the location estimations among the four interferograms. When both corrections were applied, the overall standard deviation was 1.16 cm, which was even larger than the ionospheric corrected interferogram. We reported the source characteristics of NKT-4 based on the modelling results derived from the ionospheric corrected interferogram. The preferred estimation of NKT-4 was a Mogi source located at 129 degrees 04' 22.35`E, 41. 17'54.57'' N buried at 385.48 m depth. The cavity radius caused by the underground explosion was 22.66 m. We reported the yield estimation to be 9.43 kt. This study showed that for large-scale natural deformation sources such as volcanoes and earthquakes, atmospheric corrections would be more significant, but even if the atmospheric signal did not have much complexity, the corrections should not be ignored.

High-precision location and yield of North Korea's 2013 nuclear test

High-precision Location of North Korea's 2009 Nuclear Test

Yield estimation of North Korean underground nuclear tests using Lg-wave source spectra

Seismological Evidence for a Low-Yield Nuclear Test on 12 May 2010 in North Korea

Reexamination Confirming Additional Seismic Evidence for the 12 May 2010 Low-Yield Nuclear Test

Source Characteristics of North Korea's 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test

Establishing the case for a May 2010 low-yield, unannounced nuclear test in North Korea

Triggered Seismicity after North Korea’s 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test

Collapse and Earthquake Swarm After North Korea's 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test

Bayesian Inversion of MDJ Seismograms for Source Parameters and Yields of DPRK Underground Nuclear Explosions 2 to 6

Using Moment Tensor Inversions for Rapid Seismic Source Detection and Characterization: Application to the North Korean Nuclear Tests

Quantitative assessment to the impact of InSAR ionospheric and tropospheric corrections on source parameter modelling: application to the 4th nuclear test, North Korea

GNSS observations of ionospheric disturbances in response to the underground nuclear explosion in North Korea

Preface to the Focus Section on North Korea's September 2017 Nuclear Test and Its Aftermath

Remote monitoring of weak aftershock activity with waveform cross correlation: the case of the DPRK September 9, 2016 underground test

Estimating North Korea's nuclear capabilities: Insights from a study on tritium production in a 5MWe graphite-moderated reactor

Geomagnetic Conjugate Observations of Ionospheric Disturbances in Response to a North Korean Underground Nuclear Explosion on 3 September 2017

Infrasound from the North Korea underground explosion and subsequent collapse on 3 September 2017

Simulation of topographic effects on seismic waves from shallow explosions near the North Korean nuclear test site with emphasis on shear wave generation

The Yield Estimation Of The Explosion At The Xiangshui, Jiangsu Chemical Plant In March 2019

Exploration of the yield-ratio method at Shenguang II laser facility