[Carbon budget estimation based on different methods of CO 2 storage flux in forest ecosystems].

Ying-Chi Li,Fan Liu,Chuan-Kuan Wang,Tian Gao,Xing-Chang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202011.004
2020-01-01
Abstract:Accurate measurement of CO storage flux () in forest ecosystems is of great significance for estimating ecosystem carbon budget by eddy covariance (EC). The errors in the estimation of ecosystem carbon budget caused by different methods for calculating has yet not been comprehensively assessed. Using data from an open-path EC system and an eight-level CO/HO profile system (AP100, Campbell Scientific Inc., USA) in a broadleaved deciduous forest at the Maoer-shan in 2018, we evaluated the methodological effect of [2-min mean profile (), 30-min mean profile () and 30-min mean EC single point ()] on the estimation of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (), and gross primary productivity (GPP). The results showed that the impact of methods on forest carbon flux generally increased with the increases of time scale, indicating that gap-filling of flux data would further amplify the impacts of estimation methods. At the annual scale, NEE based on and methods were 36.3% and 29.4% lower than that based on , while based on was higher than that based on and by 8.7%. The GPP based on was 5.4% higher, while that based on was 2.1% lower than that based on . The traditional ignored the instantaneous changes in CO concentration, missed the changes of CO concentration within canopy, and thus both underestimated the actual . The approximately instantaneous profile (2-min mean profile) had higher temporal and spatial resolution and could more accurately estimate forest carbon budget with non-flat terrain and complex canopy structure. Our findings had great implications for solving the underestimation of forest and GPP as well as the overestimation of net carbon sink on complex conditions with the EC method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?