Field assessments on impact of CO2 concentration fluctuations along with complex terrain flows on the estimation of the net ecosystem exchange of temperate forests

Dexiong Teng,Jiaojun Zhu,Tian Gao,Fengyuan Yu,Yuan Zhu,Xinhua Zhou,Bai Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-6
IF: 4.184
2024-01-12
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Abstract:The CO 2 storage (F s ) is the cumulation or depletion in CO 2 amount over a period in an ecosystem. Along with the eddy-covariance flux and wind-stream advection of CO 2 , it is a major term in the net ecosystem CO 2 exchange (NEE) equation, dominating under stable atmospheric stratification for forest ecosystems over complex terrains. However, estimating the F s remains challenging due to the frequent gusts and random fluctuations in boundary-layer flows, posing difficulties in capturing the true trend of CO 2 changes for accurate storage estimation using eddy-covariance along with the atmospheric profile techniques. Using the measurements from Qingyuan Ker Towers equipped with NEE instrument systems separately covering mixed-broadleaf, oak, and larch forests in a mountain watershed, this study investigates the gust periods and CO 2 fluctuation magnitudes while examining their impact on F s estimation in relation to the terrain complexity index (TCI). The gusts induce CO 2 fluctuations at numerous periods of 1 to 10 min over two hours. Diurnal, seasonal, and spatial differences ( P < 0.01) in the maximum amplitude of CO 2 fluctuations ( A max ) ranges from 1.6 to 136.7 ppm and these difference in a period ( P max ) at the same significant level ranges 140 to 170 second. The A max and P max are significantly correlated to the magnitude and random error of F s with diurnal and seasonal differences. These correlations decrease as CO 2 averaging time windows becomes longer. To minimize the uncertainties of F s , a constant [CO 2 ] averaging time window for the F s estimates is not ideal. Dynamic averaging time windows and a decision-level fusion model can reduce the potential F s underestimation by 28.6 %–33.3 %, being equivalent to 1.9 %–4.3 % NEE underestimation for temperate forests. The study's approach is notable for incorporating TCI and utilizing three flux towers for replication, making the findings applicable to similar regions with a single tower.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?