EVALUATION OF CERVICAL LENGTH AND OPTIMAL TIMING FOR PREGNANCY AFTER CERVICAL CONIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA

Xiao Zhang,Jinfei Tong,Xudong Ma,Hailan Yu,Xiaojing Guan,Jianqiong Li,Jianhua Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000023411
IF: 1.6
2020-01-01
Medicine
Abstract:To evaluate the change of cervical length and the best timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). This was a retrospective study including patients under 40 years with fertility desire treated by cervical conization for CIN. To assess the cervical length, the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different surgery procedure: loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cold knife conisation (CKC). Patients with cervical length < 2.5 cm in CKC group were divided into 2 groups according to whether receiving cervical cerclage. Trans-vaginal ultrasound examination was used to measure cervical length by fixed professional sonographers. In LEEP group, the cervical length preoperative was significantly longer than 3 months postoperatively (3.03 +/- 0.45 cm vs 2.84 +/- 0.44 cm, P = .000). In CKC group, the cervical length preoperative was significantly longer than 3 and 6 months postoperatively (2.90 +/- 0.41 cm vs 2.43 +/- 0.43 cm and 2.68 +/- 0.41 cm, respectively, P = .000). Cervical length was significantly longer at 12 and 9 months after cerclage compared to that without cerclage. Eighteen patients got pregnant in LEEP group, among which one was pregnant at 5 months postoperatively and had premature delivery. There was 1 inevitable abortion and 1 preterm birth among 39 pregnant patients from CKC group. Patients who have fertility desire with CIN were recommended for pregnancy at 6 and 9 months after LEEP and CKC, respectively. Cerclage effectively prolonged cervical length in patents with that less than 2.5 cm to prevent cervical incompetence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?