Effects of Early Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Hospitalized Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Hsin- Yueh Lu,Chiu-Fan Chen,David Lin Lee,Yi-Ju Tsai,Pei-Chin Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S397361
2023-05-15
International Journal of COPD
Abstract:Hsin- Yueh Lu, 1, &ast Chiu-Fan Chen, 2, 3, &ast David Lin Lee, 2, 3 Yi-Ju Tsai, 4 Pei-Chin Lin 4, 5 1 Division of Respiratory Therapy, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 2 Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 3 School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan; 4 Department of Medical Education and Research, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 5 Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Pei-Chin Lin, Department of Medical Education and Research, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No. 386, Dazhong 1st Road, Zuoying District, Kaohsiung, 813, Taiwan, Tel +886-7-3422121 ext 71584, Email Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) effectively improves symptoms and exercise ability in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the effectiveness and timing of early PR on hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is still debated. Methods: This study conducted a meta-analysis to compare the outcome benefits between early PR and usual care for patient hospitalized due to AECOPD. A systematic search was performed for retrieving randomized control trials (RCTs) from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library until November 2021. RCTs reporting early PR for AECOPD with hospitalization, either during admission or within four weeks of discharge, were enrolled for systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: Twenty RCTs (1274 participants) were included. Early PR showed significantly improved readmission rate (ten trials, risk ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50– 0.92), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD, twelve trials, MD 59.73, 95% CI 36.34– 83.12), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire score (eight trials, MD − 10.65, 95% CI − 14.78 to − 6.52), Borg score (eight trials, MD − 0.79, 95% CI − 1.26 to − 0.32), and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (eight trials, MD − 0.38, 95% CI − 0.5 to − 0.25). However, the trend of mortality (six trials, risk ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.39– 1.34) benefit was not significant. The subgroup analysis showed non-significant trends of better effect in early PR during admission than those after discharge for outcomes of 6MWD, quality of life, and dyspnea. However, non-significant trends of less benefits on mortality and readmission rate were found in early PR during the admission. Conclusion: Overall, early PR is beneficial for AECOPD with hospitalization, and there was no significant outcome difference between PR initiated during admission or within 4 weeks of discharge. Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, exacerbation, hospitalization, pulmonary rehabilitation Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a clinical syndrome characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms and irreversible airflow limitation, is the third leading cause of death worldwide, with 3.2 million deaths in 2017 and a worldwide prevalence of 10.1%. 1,2 Acute exacerbation (AE) is a serious complication of COPD and has many adverse effects, including worsening of the quality of life, accelerating disease progression, and increased hospital admissions and mortality. 3–7 AE is an important poor prognostic factor for COPD and is also the most common cause of admission in COPD patients. 8 It was reported that severe AE resulted in three times higher mortality in COPD patients than in those without severe AE. 7 Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is considered a cornerstone for COPD management. According to current guidelines and literature, PR provides additional benefits on respiratory symptoms, exercise ability, quality of life (QoL), readmission rate, acute exacerbation, and survival in stable COPD patients than the standard medical therapy. 9,10 The recent American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) guideline also suggests that PR should be initiated within three weeks following discharge from acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). 11 PR is a comprehensive intervention and is designed to improve the physical and psychological condition of patients with the chronic respiratory disease. 12 Exercise training is a key component of PR and includes endurance training and resistance training. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is an alternative rehabili -Abstract Truncated-
respiratory system