Abstract:Objective: The objective of this evidence-based review was to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Technology: Pulmonary rehabilitation refers to a multidisciplinary program of care for patients with chronic respiratory impairment that is individually tailored and designed to optimize physical and social performance and autonomy. Exercise training is the cornerstone of pulmonary rehabilitation programs, though they may also include components such as patient education and psychological support. Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended as the standard of care in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with COPD who remain symptomatic despite treatment with bronchodilators. For the purpose of this review, the Medical Advisory Secretariat focused on pulmonary rehabilitation programs as defined by the Cochrane Collaboration—that is, any inpatient, outpatient, or home-based rehabilitation program lasting at least 4 weeks that includes exercise therapy with or without any form of education and/or psychological support delivered to patients with exercise limitations attributable to COPD. Research Questions: What is the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation compared with usual care (UC) for patients with stable COPD?Does early pulmonary rehabilitation (within 1 month of hospital discharge) in patients who had an acute exacerbation of COPD improve outcomes compared with UC (or no rehabilitation)?Do maintenance or postrehabilitation programs for patients with COPD who have completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program improve outcomes compared with UC? Search Strategy: For Research Questions 1and 2, a literature search was performed on August 10, 2010 for studies published from January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2010. For Research Question 3, a literature search was performed on February 3, 2011 for studies published from January 1, 2000 to February 3, 2011. Abstracts were reviewed by a single reviewer and, for those studies meeting the eligibility criteria, full-text articles were obtained. Reference lists and health technology assessment websites were also examined for any additional relevant studies not identified through the systematic search. Inclusion Criteria: Research questions 1 and 2: published between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2010randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analysesCOPD study populationstudies comparing pulmonary rehabilitation with UC (no pulmonary rehabilitation)duration of pulmonary rehabilitation program ≥ 6 weekspulmonary rehabilitation program had to include at minimum exercise training Research question 3: published between January 1, 2000 and February 3, 2011randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analysesCOPD study populationstudies comparing a maintenance or postrehabilitation program with UC (standard follow-up)duration of pulmonary rehabilitation program ≥ 6 weeksinitial pulmonary rehabilitation program had to include at minimum exercise training Exclusion Criteria: Research questions 1, 2, and 3: grey literatureduplicate publicationsnon-English language publicationsstudy population ≤ 18 years of agestudies conducted in a palliative populationstudies that did not report primary outcome of interest Additional exclusion criteria for research question 3: studies with ≤ 2 sessions/visits per month Outcomes of Interest: The primary outcomes of interest for the stable COPD population were exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). For the COPD population following an exacerbation, the primary outcomes of interest were hospital readmissions and HRQOL. The primary outcomes of interest for the COPD population undertaking maintenance programs were functional exercise capacity and HRQOL. Quality of Evidence: The quality of each included study was assessed taking into consideration allocation concealment, randomization, blinding, power/sample size, withdrawals/dropouts, and intention-to-treat analyses. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed as high, moderate, low, or very low according to the GRADE Working Group criteria. The following definitions of quality were used in grading the quality of the evidence: [Table: see text] Research Question 1: Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Outcomes in Stable COPD: Seventeen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The following conclusions are based on moderate quality of evidence. Pulmonary rehabilitation including at least 4 weeks of exercise training leads to clinically and statistically significant improvements in HRQOL in patients with COPD.Pulmonary rehabilitation also leads to a clinically and statistically significant improvement in functional exercise capacity (weighted mean difference, 54.83 m; 95% confidence interval, 35.63–74.03; P < 0.001). Research Question 2: Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Outcomes Following an Acute Exacerbation of COPD: Five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and are included in this review. The following conclusion is based on moderate quality of evidence. Pulmonary rehabilitation (within 1 month of hospital discharge) after acute exacerbation significantly reduces hospital readmissions (relative risk, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.77; P = 0.001) and leads to a statistically and clinically significant improvement in HRQOL. Research Question 3: Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Maintenance Programs on COPD Outcomes: Three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and are included in this review. The conclusions are based on a low quality of evidence and must therefore be considered with caution. Maintenance programs have a nonsignificant effect on HRQOL and hospitalizations.Maintenance programs have a statistically but not clinically significant effect on exercise capacity (P = 0.01). When subgrouped by intensity and quality of study, maintenance programs have a statistically and marginally clinically significant effect on exercise capacity.

The severity of acute exacerbations of COPD and the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation

Pulmonary rehabilitation for acute exacerbations of COPD: A systematic review

Do pulmonary rehabilitation programmes improve outcomes in patients with COPD posthospital discharge for exacerbation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation on pulmonary function parameters and dyspnea in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Physical status, symptoms and health-related quality of life during a severe exacerbation of COPD: Recovery and discriminative capacity for future events

Pulmonary rehabilitation for acute and stable COPD : a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The benefits of early pulmonary rehabilitation with incentive spirometer among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Early pulmonary rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of COPD: a randomised controlled trial

Predicting Response to In-Hospital Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Individuals Recovering From Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Early Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Optimising PR for COPD: Does Severity Matter?

Early home-based pulmonary rehabilitation following acute exacerbation of COPD: A feasibility study using an action research approach

COMPARISON OF SYMPTOMS AND CHANGES IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVEL AFTER COPD EXACERBATION

Age does not hamper the response to pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD patients

Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence-based analysis

Is the motivational regulation for exercise associated with disease severity and current exercise capacity after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ECOPD)? Preliminary results

Early comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation for hospitalized patients with acute ex-acerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial

Impact of acute exacerbations of COPD on patients' health status beyond pulmonary function: A scoping review

Effect of Respiratory Rehabilitation Nursing Interventions on Acute Exacerbation Symptoms of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Among Hospitalized Geriatric Patients

Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Patients Undergoing a Short-Term Aerobic Exercise Program while Hospitalized due to Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Aerobic Exercise Training in Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis