Abstract:9/1 1 represents less a tear in the fabric of history, or a break with the past, than an inflection in ongoing historical processes, such as the continued expansion of capitalism that at some recent time has supposedly attained the level of globalization. This paper will consider the relation of war and politics with respect to three instances arising in the wake of 9/1 1 , including the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq, and finally the global war on terror (GWT). Since human beings are social animals who live in a political context, nothing we do is wholly isolated from political considerations. 'Polities' can be understood in different ways, including the fact that human beings are born into and determined by the social context into which they are socialized, within which they learn to speak, whose ideas and ideals they take on, and so on. It can also be understood as the series of factors, both immediate and long-term, including considerations drawn from party politics as well as ideological sources, which influence attitudes toward war. At its best, politics concerns the question of the good life in society, for instance the difficult theme, which already concerned Plato, of justice in a social context. More often, it turns on a struggle for power that has little or nothing to do with justice. As concerns war, politics operates in different ways. These include the conception of war; its desirability or lack thereof; the decision to go or not to go to war; the conduct of the war; and the attitude one takes after the war is completed. Politics and war have probably never been dissociated. In the U.S., political considerations have recently played an important role after 9/11 in authorizing two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as the GWT. This paper will examine the political dimension of the three wars into which the U.S. has entered since 9/11.1 will argue that these wars are superficially dissimilar, but that on a deeper level they all relate to a single ideological position that is an important motivation in current U.S. foreign policy, and that this position is further related to capitalism.

On the So‐Called War on Terrorism

On War, Politics and Capitalism after 9/11

“Call to Arms” Against Iraq: An Analysis of the Rhetoric of U.S. President Bush’s

The meaning of 11 September and the emerging postinternational world

Analysis of American Anti-terrorism Strategy in the New Global Anti-terrorism Era

Terrorism, public relations, and propaganda

Media DevelopmentVol LIV 3/2007

Defining Terrorism in International Law

Perspectives on Ecoterrorism: Catalysts, Conflations, and Casualties

Terrorism: The Culture Brutality in the Context of Globalization

When Friends Turned into Enemies: the Role of the National State Vs. Tehrik-I-Taliban Pakistan (ttp) in the War Against Terrorism in Pakistan

On the Issue of International Law in the Anti-terrorism Struggle

Not Waiting for the Barbarians

Dirty Hands, Clean Conscience? The CIA Inspector General's Investigation of “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques” in the War on Terror and the Torture Debate

War and Peace in the Context of Catholic Social Thought:American Catholics and the U.S. Policy Reactions to Terrorism after 9/11

Terrorism Series: The Impact of the 9/11 Attacks and their Aftermath on American Television

The Rise of iWar: Identity, Information, and the Individualization of Modern Warfare

9/11 and the Advent of Total Diplomacy: Strategic communication as a primary weapon of war

The ambivalent relationship between war and peace : public speeches concerning the issue of terrorism 1

Is Torture Ever Legally Permissible? — Review on Maureen Ramsay Can the Torture of Terrorist Suspects Be Justified?

Role of Media in Shaping Public Opinion About War in Afghanistan Post 9/11