Frequency effect on land CSEM sounding

Wan Wei,Tang XinGong,Huang QingHua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2019N0069
2019-01-01
Abstract:The land controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) method observes the electromagnetic field of wide frequency band excited by single source. According to the physical nature of the electromagnetic field in frequency domain, the observation of the land CSEM method can be approximately divided into three sections: the near-zone field, the middle-zone field and the farzone field. The conventional land CSEM method such as CSAMT only uses the far-zone field data, which possibly fails to utilize the information contained in the near-zone and middle-zone. We have developed 3D forward and inversion tool for land CSEM method, which is based on the open source EM modular platform ModEM. Our algorithm solves the primary and secondary electrical field separately in the forward modeling, and directly fits E-x component in all of the three zones in the inversion scheme. After discussing the response of electric field E-s in different field zones, we investigate the best frequency combinations for 3D inversion. The 3D CSEM numerical simulation shows that in near-zone field the abnormal response of E, has large amplitude and does not change with frequency significantly, and the inversion result of the synthetic data shows that the near-zone field has poor resolution in depth. The simulation also shows that the center of the surface E, abnormal response contour in the middle-zone field is not located above the center of the anomaly body, but is offset from the transverse electrical interface of resistivity model, which results in the deviation of the inverted resistivity anomaly from the actual position in the synthetic inversion test. The far-zone field E, abnormal response varies with frequency, which can be used to distinguish the electrical layers at different depths. By comparing and analyzing the inversion results of different frequency combinations of synthetic data and field data, we find that for land CSEM 3D inversion the best frequency choice is to combine the data in the near-zone field and far-zone field together, abandon the data in middle-zone field.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?