Abstract:Likert scales are useful for collecting data on attitudes and perceptions from large samples of people. In particular, they have become a well-established tool in soundscape studies for conducting in situ surveys to determine how people experience urban public spaces. However, it is still unclear whether the metrics of the scales are consistently interpreted during a typical assessment task. The current work aims at identifying some general trends in the interpretation of Likert scale metrics and introducing a procedure for the derivation of metric corrections by analyzing a case study dataset of 984 soundscape assessments across 11 urban locations in London. According to ISO/TS 12913-2:2018, soundscapes can be assessed through the scaling of 8 dimensions: pleasant, annoying, vibrant, monotonous, eventful, uneventful, calm, and chaotic. The hypothesis underlying this study is that a link exists between correlations across the percentage of assessments falling in each Likert scale category and a dilation/compression factor affecting the interpretation of the scales metric. The outcome of this metric correction value derivation is introduced for soundscape, and a new projection of the London soundscapes according to the corrected circumplex space is compared with the initial ISO circumplex space. The overall results show a general non-equidistant interpretation of the scales, particularly on the vibrant-monotonous direction. The implications of this correction have been demonstrated through a Linear Ridge Classifier task for predicting the London soundscape responses using objective acoustic parameters, which shows significant improvement when applied to the corrected data. The results suggest that the corrected values account for the non-equidistant interpretation of the Likert metrics, thereby allowing mathematical operations to be viable when applied to the data.

The Soundscape Indices (SSID) Protocol: A Method for Urban Soundscape Surveys—Questionnaires with Acoustical and Contextual Information

Developing a taxonomy of soundscape design from real-world examples

Developing Soundscapegraphy For The Notation Of Urban Soundscape: Its Concept, Method, Analysis And Application

Research on Soundscapegraphy for the Notation of Urban Soundscape

Research on Structure of Soundscape in Urban Open Spaces and Its Design Method

Explication and Design of Soundscape in Urban Landscape

Developing a taxonomy of soundscape interventions from a catalogue of real-world examples

Applying the methods of image evaluation and spatial analysis to study the sound environment of urban street areas

Toward the Definition of a Soundscape Ranking Index (SRI) in an Urban Park Using Machine Learning Techniques

A conceptual framework for the practical use of predictive models and Soundscape Indices: Goals, constraints, and applications

Soundscape in city and built environment: current developments and design potentials

Soundscape diversity: Evaluation indices of the sound environment in urban green spaces – Effectiveness, role, and interpretation

Exploring the Dimensions of Everyday Soundscapes Perception in Spatiotemporal View: A Qualitative Approach

Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models

Soundscape Case Study: Acoustics, Ecology and Its Anthropological Sense

A Perceptual Structure of Soundscapes in Urban Public Spaces Using Semantic Coding Based on the Grounded Theory

Non-auditory factors affecting urban soundscape evaluation

Introducing a Method for Intervals Correction on Multiple Likert Scales: A Case Study on an Urban Soundscape Data Collection Instrument

Ten questions concerning soundscape valuation

What Do We Mean by “Soundscape”? A Functional Description

Measuring soundscape quality of urban environments using physiological indicators: construction of physiological assessment dimensions and comparison with subjective dimensions