Abstract:Background Despite growing attention from researchers and governments, challenges persist in comprehensively assessing urban sound quality by integrating both quietness and naturalness aspects. Goals This study aimed to develop an innovative soundscape quality index that concurrently evaluates quietness and naturalness in urban soundscapes. Our objectives included conducting urban soundscape quality mapping, analyzing influential mechanisms, and identifying priority zones for sound environment management. Approaches We collected sound pressure level (SPL) and raw audio data, from which we computed a normalized difference soundscape index (NDSI). With a dataset comprising 28 explanatory variables encompassing land use, built environment, vegetation characteristics, and temporal factors, we employed the random forest (RF) model to predict 10 indicators, including eight SPL-related indices, NDSI, and the QNS (quietness and naturalness soundscape) index. Crucially, we utilized SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values to interpret the RF model. Findings Spatial variations in quietness and naturalness were evident, closely associated with road networks and vegetation, respectively, with discernible temporal variations. The top three variables influencing QNS were distance to major roads, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and proportion of tree coverage. Moreover, interaction effects highlighted dual negative or synergistic promoting effects on QNS from factors such as road width, human disturbance, vegetation configurations, and land cover. Notably, these mechanisms were successfully applied to six typical tourist attractions in Xiamen city, where five types of management zones were mapped based on priority considerations of population density and soundscape quality. Interestingly, natural soundscape reserves were highly correlated with city parks, high-risk zones predominantly overlapped with road networks, and potential zones comprised inner communities between streets. Significance The framework demonstrated effectiveness in mapping, exploring mechanisms, and guiding management strategies for the urban sound environment.

Measuring soundscape quality of urban environments using physiological indicators: construction of physiological assessment dimensions and comparison with subjective dimensions

Explication and Design of Soundscape in Urban Landscape

Develop a Public Response Model of Soundscape for Urban Landscape Garden Parks

A Study on the Soundscape Satisfaction Degree of Urban Landscape Garden Parks

The Physiological Restorative Role of Soundscape in Different Forest Structures

Exploring the Dimensions of Everyday Soundscapes Perception in Spatiotemporal View: A Qualitative Approach

Soundscape Perceptions and Preferences for Different Groups of Users in Urban Recreational Forest Parks

The effects of environmental sensitivity and noise sensitivity on soundscape evaluation

Non-auditory factors affecting urban soundscape evaluation

The development and application of the emotional dimensions of a soundscape

Improving Soundscape Comfort in Urban Green Spaces Based on Aural-Visual Interaction Attributes of Landscape Experience

An exploratory framework for mapping, mechanism, and management of urban soundscape quality: From quietness to naturalness

Relationship between contextual perceptions and soundscape evaluations based on the structural equation modelling approach

Perception of urban park soundscape

Context-Expectation, Desensitization, and Synaesthesia: Comparing the Physical Acoustic Environment and Perceptual Soundscapes in Urban Public Spaces

Assessing the affective quality of soundscape for individuals: Using third-party assessment combined with an artificial intelligence (TPA-AI) model

Contribution of soundscape appropriateness to soundscape quality assessment in space: a mediating variable affecting acoustic comfort

Quantification of Visual Attention by Using Eye-Tracking Technology for Soundscape Assessment Through Physiological Response

Natural soundscapes, urban design and psychological well-being

Comparison between perceived and felt emotions in the soundscape evaluation of urban open spacesa)

Thermal–Acoustic Interaction Effects on Physiological and Psychological Measures in Urban Forests: A Laboratory Study