A Comparative Study:Effects of Different Protein Sources on Flesh Quality of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) and Japanese Seabass (Lateolabrax japonicas)
Xiaotong YU,Xiaofang LIANG,Jia WANG,Fang HAN,Junguo LI,Yinhua ZHENG,Xiufeng WU,Xin WANG,Xufang LIANG,Min XUE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.07.010
2016-01-01
Abstract:This study aimed to compare the effects of different protein sources on body composition, free ami?no acid composition in muscle and fillet texture characteristics of grass carp ( Ctenopharyngodon idellus) and Japanese seabass ( Lateolabrax japonicas) . Three isoenergetic and isonitrogenous experimental diets were de?signed for grass carp and Japanese seabass, respectively. The control group diet for grass carp used low temper?ature steam?dried fish meal as sole protein source, and used blended plant protein ( soybean meal and soybean protein concentrate) to replace 80% and 100% fish meal, respectively, which were named as CI?FM, CI?PPB80 and CI?PPB100 groups, respectively. The control group diet for Japanese seabass used Peru fish meal as sole protein source, and used blended plant protein ( cottonseed protein concentrate and soybean protein con?centrate) to replace 50% and 100% fish meal, respectively, which were named as LJ?FM, LJ?PPB50 and LJ?PPB100 groups, respectively. Each grass carp diet was fed to 3 replicates with 20 grass carp [ initial body weight of (153.40±0.30) g], and each Japanese seabass diet was fed to 4 replicates with 25 Japanese seabass [(initial body weight of (12.97±0.03) g]. After an 8?week experiment, body composition, free amino acid composition in muscle and fillet texture characteristics, drop loss, shear force and collagen content were inves?tigated. The results showed that muscle ether extract content of grass carp in CI?PPB100 group were significant?ly decreased ( P<0.05) , while ash content was significantly increased compared with CI?FM group ( P<0.05) . However , the muscle ether extract content of Japanese seabass was firstly increased and then down with the re?placement level increasing, and showed LJ?PPB100 group was significantly higher than LJ?PPB50 group ( P<0.05) . No differences were observed in the muscle total free amino acid ( TFAA) and biogenic precursor con?tents among all groups of grass carp ( P>0.05) . With the replacement level increasing, the muscle TFAA and flavor amino acid ( FAA) contents of Japanese seabass were significantly decreased ( P<0.05) and biogenic precursor content was significantly increased ( P<0.05) . We found several specific components in both species. Furthermore, the texture characteristics of raw and cooked fillets showed much more significant difference be?tween the two species. For both of fish, the raw fillets in full fish meal groups showed significantly higher hard?ness, gumminess, chewiness, resilience and shear force than those of blended plant protein groups ( P<0.05) . The cohesiveness of cooked fillets of CI?PPB80 group was significantly higher than that of other two groups ( P<0.05) , but no significant differences were observed in the other indexes ( P>0.05) . The hardness and ad?hesive of cooked fillets of LJ?PPB100 group were significantly higher than those of LJ?FM group ( P<0.05) , but no significant differences were observed in the other indexes ( P>0.05) . In conclusion, using blended plant protein to replace fish meal can reduce fillet lipopexia for two species, and has no effect on muscle TFAA con?tent of grass carp, but can reduce the muscle FAA, biogenic precursor and essential amino acid contents, and shorten the shelf life of Japanese seabass. High plant protein diet can reduce flesh quality, while high fish meal diet can ensure a better flesh quality of grass carp and Japanese seabass.