Abstract:Background: Low-to-zero fluoroscopic navigation systems lower radiation exposure which improves health outcomes. Conventional x-ray fluoroscopy (CF) has long been the standard to guide to catheter location for cardiac ablation. With advancements in technology, alternative safety navigation systems have been developed. Three primary modalities commonly utilized are three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D-EAM), magnetic navigation system (MNS), and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), all of which can reduce radiation exposure during the procedure. Objective: We aim to compare the efficacy and safety among ICE, EAM, MNS, and CF in ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Methods: This is a meta-analysis consisting of observational studies and randomized controlled trials, which evaluated the performance of navigation systems of catheter ablation in AVNRT patients. Primary endpoint was to access the AVNRT recurrence after the procedure during follow-up periods. Secondary endpoints were technical success, fluoroscopic time, fluoroscopic dose area product, radiofrequency ablation time, and adverse events. Random-effect model was applied for pooled estimated effects of included studies. Results: A total of 21 studies (21 CF, 2 ICE, 9 EAM, 11 MNS) including 1716 patients who underwent catheter ablation for AVNRT treatment were analyzed. Of these, 16 were observational studies and 5 were randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome: Point estimation of AVNRT recurrence showed ICE exhibited a pooled odds ratio (ORs) of 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.064-17.322), MNS with ORs of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.214-1.219], and EAM with ORs of 0.394 (95% CI: 0.119-1.305) when compared to CF. Secondary outcomes: EAM had significant higher technical success with ORs of 2.781 (95% CI: 1.317-5.872) when compared to CF. Regarding fluoroscopy time, EAM showed the lowest time with mean differences (MD) of -10.348 min (95% CI: -13.385 to -7.3101) and P-score of 0.998. It was followed by MNS with MD of -3.712 min (95% CI: -7.128 to -0.295) and P-score of 0.586, ICE with MD of -1.150 min (95% CI: -6.963 to 4.662) with a P-score of 0.294 compared to CF, which has a P-score of 0.122. There were insignificant adverse events across the procedures. Conclusion: AVNRT ablation navigated by low-to-zero fluoroscopic navigation systems achieves higher efficacy and comparable safety to conventional fluoroscopywhile also reducing risk of radiation exposure time.

Remote Magnetic Navigation Versus Manual Control Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures

Remote Magnetic Navigation Facilitates the Ablations of Frequent Ventricular Premature Complexes Originating from the Outflow Tract and the Valve Annulus As Compared to Manual Control Navigation.

Comparison of the Mid-Term Outcomes of Robotic Magnetic Navigation-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback

Cryoballoon Ablation Versus Remote Magnetic Navigation Ablation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: a Prospective Controlled Study

Impact of Catheter Ablation with Remote Magnetic Navigation on Procedural Outcomes in Patients with Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Procedural outcomes and learning curve of cardiac arrhythmias catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation: Experience from a large-scale single-center study

Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison

Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia using remote magnetic navigation system

Comparing Low-to-Zero Fluoroscopic Navigation Systems for AVNRT Catheter Ablation: A Network Meta-Analysis

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Robotic Magnetic Navigation Reduces the Incidence of Silent Cerebral Embolism

Utilization of Steerable Sheath Improves the Efficiency of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Guided by Robotic Magnetic Navigation Compared with Fixed‐curve Sheath

The feasibility of using remote magnetic navigation system as the primary technological training tool for novice cardiac electrophysiology operators in the catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathway

Magnetic Navigation In Ultrasound-Guided Interventional Radiology Procedures

Cryoballoon Vs. Robotic Magnetic Navigation-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: 5-Year Outcomes

Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Peri-Procedural Complication Rates in nMARQ vs. Conventional Ablation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Comparison Between Robotic and Manual Ablations in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Strategy of Catheter Ablation for Para-Hisian Premature Ventricular Contractions with the Assistance of Remote Magnetic Navigation

Acute and Long Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation for the Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients with Severe Ischemic Heart Failure.

Technique and clinical outcome of catheter ablation guided by remote magnetic navigation for ventricular arrhythmias originating from outflow tract