Abstract:Abstract Introduction Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is performed in various arrhythmias. Still, arrhythmia recurrence is a challenging problem, not only in atrial fibrillation (AF). One reason for arrhythmia recurrence is suspected to be due to remaining gaps. Measurement of local impedance (LI) and change of LI during RF application can be used as a predictor and surrogate for successful ablation. Another tool, used for the last couple of years, estimating sufficient tissue contact is provided by catheters with real-time contact force (CF) measurement. The new INTELLANAV STABLEPOINTTM catheter by Boston Scientific was recently introduced combing both strategies. We sought to investigate the parallel measurement and correlation of LI and CF in real-time during left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) procedures. Methods We included the first n=20 patients who underwent LA ablation for AF or atypical atrial flutter and n=7 patients who underwent RA procedures for atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia and analysed retrospectively procedural data. For every RF delivery RF duration, CF, baseline LI, minimal LI, LI drop, as well as minimal LI and LI drop after 5 and 10 sec was documented. Only RF deliveries with stable contact (ablation without delay) were included. We then correlated baseline LI to LI drop (maximum, after 5 sec, after 10 sec) and to the documented CF at baseline. Results A total of 27 procedures was analysed. In total, 777 RF deliveries (663 in LA, 114 in RA) were documented with a mean RF duration of 21.7 sec. Mean baseline LI was 148.4 Ω, minimal LI 130.6Ω, LI after 5 sec 135.0 Ω and LI after 10sec 132.5 Ω. Mean complete LI drop was 17.8 Ω (13.4 Ω after 5 sec, 15.8 Ω after 10 sec). Mean CF was 15.5g. We could see a significant positive correlation between average CF and LI drop (p<0.01) (figure 1A), as well as between average CF and LI drop after 5 sec (p<0.01) and after 10 sec (p<0.01). Also, for baseline LI we could see a significant strong positive correlation to LI drop (p<0.001) (figure 1B), LI drop after 5 sec (p<0.001) and after 10 sec (p<0.001). Baseline LI did not correlate to average CF. Baseline LI was significantly higher in RA, when compared to LA (152.5Ω vs. 147.7Ω; p<0.05). LI drop did not differ between RA and LA procedures (17.8Ω vs. 17.7Ω), whereas mean RF duration per RF application was significantly longer in LA compared to RA procedures (22.8sec vs. 15.3sec; p<0.001) and applied CF was also higher in LA compared to RA procedures (16.0Ω vs. 12.8Ω; p<0.001). Conclusion Parallel real-time measurement of LI and CF is providing further insights into ablation biophysics. Based on these results the CF values might provide a prediction of subsequent lesion formation. A combination with LI measurement seems to be useful to prevent insufficient lesions, predisposing to gap formation and associated with arrhythmia recurrence, but also to potentially guarantee a higher safety by visualizing the applied CF and consecutive LI drop. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1

Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison

A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback

Potential Maintenance Mechanism in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Subject to Different Treatment Procedures: A Preliminary Study Based on a Human Atrial Model

Contact force monitoring during catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with congenital heart disease

Procedural outcomes and learning curve of cardiac arrhythmias catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation: Experience from a large-scale single-center study

Comparison of the accuracy of contact force measurement in four commercially available force-sensing ablation catheters

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Robotic Magnetic Navigation Reduces the Incidence of Silent Cerebral Embolism

Effect of Postablation Monitoring Strategy on Long-Term Outcome for Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Comparison between remotely supported nurse-led electro-anatomic mapping and standard onsite engineer support for electrophysiological procedures

Real-world effectiveness and safety of a contact force-sensing catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation in China

Contact Force-Sensing versus Standard Catheters in Non-Fluoroscopic Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmias

Concomitant real-time measurement and correlation of contact force to baseline local impedance and local impedance drops in RF ablation of left and right atrial procedures

Contact forces during hybrid atrial fibrillation ablation: an in vitro evaluation

Visual, tactile, and contact force feedback: Which one is more important for catheter ablation? Results from an in vitro experimental study

Comparing rates of atrioesophageal fistula with contact force-sensing and non-contact force-sensing catheters: analysis of post-market safety surveillance data

The feasibility of using remote magnetic navigation system as the primary technological training tool for novice cardiac electrophysiology operators in the catheter ablation of left-sided accessory pathway

Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database

Best practices in robotic magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias, a position paper of the Society for Cardiac Robotic Navigation

Overcoming Access Challenges to Treat Arrhythmias in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Using Robotic Magnetic-Guided Catheter Ablation

A comparison of clinical outcomes and cost of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia

A novel approach for quantitative electrogram analysis for driver identification: Implications for ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation