Abstract:The quantity–quality tradeoff theory implies that a reduction in fertility would induce more human capital investment per child, and it is widely believed that population control policy could promote human capital levels in developing countries. China's one-child policy (OCP) has significantly reduced the fertility in the country, and popular belief holds that this policy has contributed to the enhancement in China's human capital since 1979. However, the quantity–quality tradeoff dose not present the complete truth—another crucial factor relates to which segment of the population is reduced, a critical issue that has been ignored in the literature. China's OCP is significantly more strictly implemented in urban areas than in rural areas, where human capital investment in children is significantly lower. This two-tier OCP could have significantly increased the rural–urban fertility ratio and brought about important consequences. We first emphasize the importance of such a population compositional effect, which may offset the potentially positive quantity–quality tradeoff effect on human capital. We present a simple analytic framework and quantify the relative sizes of the quantity–quality tradeoff and compositional effects. We find that the former is dominated by the latter, and that the OCP has reduced the average human capital level of China's next generation by approximately 1–2%. This novel evidence indicates that the conventional wisdom on population control may be incomplete and that its policy implications could be misleading.

The Effect of Family Size on Education: New Evidence from China's One Child Policy

Family Size, Birth Order and Educational Attainment: Evidence from China

The Unintended Consequences of Relaxing Birth Quotas: Theory and Evidence

When Fewer Means More: Impact of One-Child Policy on Education of Girls

Fertility and labor supply: evidence from the One-Child Policy in China

The Evolution of China's One-Child Policy and Its Effects on Family Outcomes

Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birthweight, and China's 'one Child' Policy

The Effect of China's One-Child Family Policy after 25 Years.

Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birthweight, and Chinaâ•Žs â•ŸOne Childâ•Ž Policy

Does the One-Child Policy Improve Children's Human Capital in Urban China? A Regression Discontinuity Design

Fertility Restrictions and Life Cycle Outcomes: Evidence from the One-Child Policy in China

Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birth Weight and China's “One-Child” Policy

The Effects of China's Universal Two-Child Policy

The Quantity-Quality Trade-off of Children in a Developing Country: Identification Using Chinese Twins

Fertility Options and Female Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Universal Two-Child Policy in China

“Selective two-child” policy and household resource allocation

Impact of Family Planning Policy on Gender Inequality: Evidence from China

Human Capital and the Only-Child Premium: Evidence from China’s One Child Policy

Family planning and fertility inequality: Evidence from the abolition of China's one‐child policy

Beyond the Quantity–Quality Tradeoff: Population Control Policy and Human Capital Investment