Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies: Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor for Prevention of Postoperative Crohn’s Disease Recurrence

Yun Qiu,Ren Mao,Bai-li Chen,Yao He,Zhi-rong Zeng,Min-hu Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv112
2015-01-01
Abstract:Background and aim: Although promising, the evidence supporting the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents [anti-TNFs] in postoperative Crohn's disease [CD] is still based on limited experience. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-TNFs for prevention of postoperative recurrence [POR] in CD.Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane database and conference proceeding abstracts were searched. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients who developed POR as defined by the primary studies.Results: Six prospective studies were included. The rate of endoscopic recurrence [ER] was significantly lower using anti-TNFs [9.2%, 7/76] compared with the non-biologicals group [61.5%, 83/135] (odds ratio [OR] 0.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.13; p < 0.001]. The rate of severe ER was also lower in the anti-TNFs group [1.6%, 1/64] than that in the non-biologicals group [32.7%, 18/55, OR 0.10; p = 0.04]. A significantly lower proportion of patients in the anti-TNFs group developed clinical recurrence [3.4%, 2/59] compared with the non-biologicals arm [41.1%, 49/119, OR 0.1; p < 0.001]. More anti-TNFs-treated patients [86.5%, 45/52] were maintained in clinical remission compared with the non-biologicals group [58.1%, 43/74, OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.60-10.29; p < 0.01]. The adverse events were similar between the two groups [anti-TNFs 44.9% [22/49] vs control 52.5% [42/80]; p = 0.69].Conclusions: Anti-TNFs are superior to non-biological agents in preventing endoscopic and clinical recurrence of CD without causing more adverse events.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?