Systematic review: Patient‐related, microbial, surgical, and histopathological risk factors for endoscopic post‐operative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease
Michiel T. J. Bak,Karlijn Demers,Nassim Hammoudi,Matthieu Allez,Mark S. Silverberg,Gwenny M. Fuhler,Kaushal Parikh,Marieke J. Pierik,Laurents P. S. Stassen,C. Janneke van der Woude,Michail Doukas,Oddeke van Ruler,Annemarie C. de Vries
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18040
IF: 9.524
2024-06-19
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Abstract:Risk factors for ePOR in international guidelines are not consistently reported as risk factors in the current literature except for active smoking and a prior bowel resection. To develop evidence‐based and personalised strategies, future large prospective studies are warranted for the identification of risk factors for ePOR in patients with CD. In addition, validation studies of promising (bio)markers are required. Summary Background Risk stratification for endoscopic post‐operative recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn's disease (CD) is required to identify patients who would benefit most from initiation of prophylactic medication and intensive monitoring of recurrence. Aims To assess the current evidence on patient‐related, microbial, surgical and histopathological risk factors for ePOR in patients with CD after ileocolic (re‐)resection. Methods Multiple online databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were searched up to March 2024. Studies with reported associations of patient‐related, microbial, surgical and/or histopathological factors for ePOR (i.e., Rutgeerts' score ≥i2 or modified Rutgeerts' score ≥i2a) were included. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale for observational cohort studies and case‐control studies. Results In total, 47 studies were included (four RCTs, 29 cohort studies, 12 case–control studies, one cross‐sectional study and one individual participant data meta‐analysis) including 6006 patients (median sample size 87 patients [interquartile range 46–170]). Risk of bias assessment revealed a poor quality in 41% of the studies. An association was reported in multiple studies of ePOR with active smoking at and post‐surgery, male sex and prior bowel resection. A heterogeneous association with ePOR was reported for other risk factors included in the current guidelines (penetrating disease, perianal disease, younger age, extensive small bowel disease and presence of granulomas in the resection specimen or myenteric plexitis in the resection margin), and other patient‐related, microbial, surgical and histopathological factors. Conclusion Risk factors for ePOR in international guidelines are not consistently reported as risk factors in current literature except for active smoking and prior bowel resection. To develop evidence‐based, personalised strategies, large prospective studies are warranted to identify risk factors for ePOR. Validation studies of promising (bio)markers are also required.
pharmacology & pharmacy,gastroenterology & hepatology