Abstract:Background: Prospective cohorts may be vulnerable to bias due to attrition. Inverse probability weights have been proposed as a method to help mitigate this bias. The current study used the "All Our Families" longitudinal pregnancy cohort of 3351 maternal-infant pairs and aimed to develop inverse probability weights using logistic regression models to predict study continuation versus drop-out from baseline to the three-year data collection wave. Methods: Two methods of variable selection took place. One method was a knowledge-based a priori variable selection approach, while the second used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). The ability of each model to predict continuing participation through discrimination and calibration for both approaches were evaluated by examining area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and calibration plots, respectively. Stabilized inverse probability weights were generated using predicted probabilities. Weight performance was assessed using standardized differences of baseline characteristics for those who continue in study and those that do not, with and without weights (unadjusted estimates). Results: The a priori and LASSO variable selection method prediction models had good and fair discrimination with AUROC of 0.69 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.67-0.71) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.75), respectively. Calibration plots and non-significant Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of Fit Tests indicated that both the a priori (p = 0.329) and LASSO model (p = 0.242) were well-calibrated. Unweighted results indicated large (> 10%) standardized differences in 15 demographic variables (range: 11 - 29%), when comparing those who continued in the study with those that did not. Weights derived from the a priori and LASSO models reduced standardized differences relative to unadjusted estimates, with the largest differences of 13% and 5%, respectively. Additionally, when applying the same LASSO variable selection method to develop weights in future data collection waves, standardized differences remained below 10% for each demographic variable. Conclusion: The LASSO variable selection approach produced robust weights that addressed non-response bias more than the knowledge-driven approach. These weights can be applied to analyses across multiple longitudinal waves of data collection to reduce bias.

Nonresponse Bias Analysis in Longitudinal Studies: A Comparative Review with an Application to the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study

A Case Study of Nonresponse Bias Analysis in Educational Assessment Surveys

Modeling of Correlated Cognitive Function and Functional Disability Outcomes with Bounded and Missing Data in a Longitudinal Aging Study

Stop or Continue Data Collection: A Nonignorable Missing Data Approach for Continuous Variables

Analysis of Longitudinal Data under Nonignorable Nonmonotone Nonresponse

Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses.

Bias in Longitudinal Data Analysis with Missing Data Using Typical Linear Mixed-Effects Modelling and Pattern-Mixture Approach: an Analytical Illustration

Bayesian Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Studies with Nonignorable Missing Data.

Model-based Inference for Two-Stage Cluster Samples Subject to Nonignorable Item Nonresponse

Bayesian Analysis of Nonlinear Reproductive Dispersion Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Missing Covariates

Asymptotic theory for longitudinal data with missing responses adjusted by inverse probability weights

Assessing the Non-Random Sampling Effects of Subject Attrition in Longitudinal Research

Mixed‐Effect Hybrid Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropout

LGM-based Analyses with Missing Data:Comparison Between ML Method and Diggle-Kenward Selection Model

Comparison of Maximum Likelihood Approach, Diggle-Kenward Selection Model, Pattern Mixture Model with MAR and MNAR Dropout Data.

Missing data approaches for longitudinal neuroimaging research: Examples from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study

On the impact of parametric assumptions and robust alternatives for longitudinal data analysis.

Developing non-response weights to account for attrition-related bias in a longitudinal pregnancy cohort

Longitudinal Data with Follow-up Truncated by Death: Match the Analysis Method to Research Aims

Accounting for bias due to outcome data missing not at random: comparison and illustration of two approaches to probabilistic bias analysis: a simulation study

Empirical likelihood semiparametric nonlinear regression analysis for longitudinal data with responses missing at random